Energy Conservation Management for People With Multiple Sclerosis-Related Fatigue: Who Benefits?

L. J. M. Blikman; J. van Meeteren; Jos W. R. Twisk; Fred A. J. de laat; Vincent de Groot; Heleen Beckerman; Henk J. Stam; Johannes B. J. Bussmann; A. Malekzadeh; L. E. van den Akker; M. Looijmans; S. A. Sanches; J. Dekker; E. H. Collette; B. W. van Oosten; C. E. Teunissen; M. A. Blankenstein; I. C. J. M. Eijssen; M. Rietberg; M. Heine; O. Verschuren; G. Kwakkel; J. M. A. Visser-Meily; I. G. L. van de Port; E. Lindeman; L. J. M. Blikman; J. van Meeteren; J. B. J. Bussmann; H. J. Stam; R. Q. Hintzen; H. G. A. Hacking; E. L. Hoogervorst; S. T. F. M. Frequin; H. Knoop; B. A. de Jong; G. Bleijenberg; M. C. Verhulsdonck; E. T. H. L. van Munster; C. J. Oosterwijk; G. J. Aarts

doi:10.5014/ajot.2019.032474

Energy Conservation Management for People With Multiple Sclerosis-Related Fatigue: Who Benefits?

L. J. M. Blikman, J. van Meeteren, Jos W. R. Twisk, Fred A. J. de laat, Vincent de Groot, Heleen Beckerman, Henk J. Stam, Johannes B. J. Bussmann, A. Malekzadeh, L. E. van den Akker, M. Looijmans, S. A. Sanches, J. Dekker, E. H. Collette, B. W. van Oosten, C. E. Teunissen, M. A. Blankenstein, I. C. J. M. Eijssen, M. Rietberg, M. HeineO. Verschuren, G. Kwakkel, J. M. A. Visser-Meily, I. G. L. van de Port, E. Lindeman, L. J. M. Blikman, J. van Meeteren, J. B. J. Bussmann, H. J. Stam, R. Q. Hintzen, H. G. A. Hacking, E. L. Hoogervorst, S. T. F. M. Frequin, H. Knoop, B. A. de Jong, G. Bleijenberg, M. C. Verhulsdonck, E. T. H. L. van Munster, C. J. Oosterwijk, G. J. Aarts

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. We investigated whether demographic, disease-related, or personal baseline determinants can predict a positive response to energy conservation management (ECM).METHOD. We conducted a secondary analysis of a single-blind, two-parallel-arms randomized controlled trial that included ambulatory adults with severe MS-related fatigue. Therapy responders and nonresponders were categorized by Checklist Individual Strength fatigue change scores between baseline and end of treatment. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the determinants of response.RESULTS. Sixty-nine participants were included (ECM group, n = 34; control group, n = 35). In the ECM group, fatigue severity, perception of fatigue, illness cognitions about MS, and social support discrepancies were related to the probability of being a responder.CONCLUSION. The results suggest that people with MS-related fatigue who had a less negative perception of fatigue and who perceived fewer disease benefits and a higher discrepancy in social support had the best response to ECM treatment.

Original language	English
Article number	7304205040
Number of pages	9
Journal	American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Volume	73
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2019.032474
Publication status	Published - Jul 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.5014/ajot.2019.032474

http://hdl.handle.net/1765/118178

Cite this

Blikman, L. J. M., van Meeteren, J., Twisk, J. W. R., de laat, F. A. J., de Groot, V., Beckerman, H., Stam, H. J., Bussmann, J. B. J., Malekzadeh, A., van den Akker, L. E., Looijmans, M., Sanches, S. A., Dekker, J., Collette, E. H., van Oosten, B. W., Teunissen, C. E., Blankenstein, M. A., Eijssen, I. C. J. M., Rietberg, M., ... Aarts, G. J. (2019). Energy Conservation Management for People With Multiple Sclerosis-Related Fatigue: Who Benefits? American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(4), Article 7304205040. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2019.032474

@article{72150aa6258b4df589fab09f651fcd67,

title = "Energy Conservation Management for People With Multiple Sclerosis-Related Fatigue: Who Benefits?",

abstract = "OBJECTIVE. We investigated whether demographic, disease-related, or personal baseline determinants can predict a positive response to energy conservation management (ECM).METHOD. We conducted a secondary analysis of a single-blind, two-parallel-arms randomized controlled trial that included ambulatory adults with severe MS-related fatigue. Therapy responders and nonresponders were categorized by Checklist Individual Strength fatigue change scores between baseline and end of treatment. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the determinants of response.RESULTS. Sixty-nine participants were included (ECM group, n = 34; control group, n = 35). In the ECM group, fatigue severity, perception of fatigue, illness cognitions about MS, and social support discrepancies were related to the probability of being a responder.CONCLUSION. The results suggest that people with MS-related fatigue who had a less negative perception of fatigue and who perceived fewer disease benefits and a higher discrepancy in social support had the best response to ECM treatment.",

author = "Blikman, {L. J. M.} and {van Meeteren}, J. and Twisk, {Jos W. R.} and {de laat}, {Fred A. J.} and {de Groot}, Vincent and Heleen Beckerman and Stam, {Henk J.} and Bussmann, {Johannes B. J.} and A. Malekzadeh and {van den Akker}, {L. E.} and M. Looijmans and Sanches, {S. A.} and J. Dekker and Collette, {E. H.} and {van Oosten}, {B. W.} and Teunissen, {C. E.} and Blankenstein, {M. A.} and Eijssen, {I. C. J. M.} and M. Rietberg and M. Heine and O. Verschuren and G. Kwakkel and Visser-Meily, {J. M. A.} and {van de Port}, {I. G. L.} and E. Lindeman and Blikman, {L. J. M.} and {van Meeteren}, J. and Bussmann, {J. B. J.} and Stam, {H. J.} and Hintzen, {R. Q.} and Hacking, {H. G. A.} and Hoogervorst, {E. L.} and Frequin, {S. T. F. M.} and H. Knoop and {de Jong}, {B. A.} and G. Bleijenberg and Verhulsdonck, {M. C.} and {van Munster}, {E. T. H. L.} and Oosterwijk, {C. J.} and Aarts, {G. J.}",

year = "2019",

month = jul,

doi = "10.5014/ajot.2019.032474",

language = "English",

volume = "73",

journal = "American Journal of Occupational Therapy",

issn = "0272-9490",

publisher = "American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc",

number = "4",

}

Blikman, LJM, van Meeteren, J, Twisk, JWR, de laat, FAJ, de Groot, V, Beckerman, H, Stam, HJ, Bussmann, JBJ, Malekzadeh, A, van den Akker, LE, Looijmans, M, Sanches, SA, Dekker, J, Collette, EH, van Oosten, BW, Teunissen, CE, Blankenstein, MA, Eijssen, ICJM, Rietberg, M, Heine, M, Verschuren, O, Kwakkel, G, Visser-Meily, JMA, van de Port, IGL, Lindeman, E, Blikman, LJM, van Meeteren, J , Bussmann, JBJ , Stam, HJ, Hintzen, RQ, Hacking, HGA, Hoogervorst, EL, Frequin, STFM, Knoop, H, de Jong, BA, Bleijenberg, G, Verhulsdonck, MC, van Munster, ETHL, Oosterwijk, CJ & Aarts, GJ 2019, 'Energy Conservation Management for People With Multiple Sclerosis-Related Fatigue: Who Benefits?', American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 73, no. 4, 7304205040. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2019.032474

TY - JOUR

T1 - Energy Conservation Management for People With Multiple Sclerosis-Related Fatigue

T2 - Who Benefits?

AU - Blikman, L. J. M.

AU - van Meeteren, J.

AU - Twisk, Jos W. R.

AU - de laat, Fred A. J.

AU - de Groot, Vincent

AU - Beckerman, Heleen

AU - Stam, Henk J.

AU - Bussmann, Johannes B. J.

AU - Malekzadeh, A.

AU - van den Akker, L. E.

AU - Looijmans, M.

AU - Sanches, S. A.

AU - Dekker, J.

AU - Collette, E. H.

AU - van Oosten, B. W.

AU - Teunissen, C. E.

AU - Blankenstein, M. A.

AU - Eijssen, I. C. J. M.

AU - Rietberg, M.

AU - Heine, M.

AU - Verschuren, O.

AU - Kwakkel, G.

AU - Visser-Meily, J. M. A.

AU - van de Port, I. G. L.

AU - Lindeman, E.

AU - Blikman, L. J. M.

AU - van Meeteren, J.

AU - Bussmann, J. B. J.

AU - Stam, H. J.

AU - Hintzen, R. Q.

AU - Hacking, H. G. A.

AU - Hoogervorst, E. L.

AU - Frequin, S. T. F. M.

AU - Knoop, H.

AU - de Jong, B. A.

AU - Bleijenberg, G.

AU - Verhulsdonck, M. C.

AU - van Munster, E. T. H. L.

AU - Oosterwijk, C. J.

AU - Aarts, G. J.

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - OBJECTIVE. We investigated whether demographic, disease-related, or personal baseline determinants can predict a positive response to energy conservation management (ECM).METHOD. We conducted a secondary analysis of a single-blind, two-parallel-arms randomized controlled trial that included ambulatory adults with severe MS-related fatigue. Therapy responders and nonresponders were categorized by Checklist Individual Strength fatigue change scores between baseline and end of treatment. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the determinants of response.RESULTS. Sixty-nine participants were included (ECM group, n = 34; control group, n = 35). In the ECM group, fatigue severity, perception of fatigue, illness cognitions about MS, and social support discrepancies were related to the probability of being a responder.CONCLUSION. The results suggest that people with MS-related fatigue who had a less negative perception of fatigue and who perceived fewer disease benefits and a higher discrepancy in social support had the best response to ECM treatment.

AB - OBJECTIVE. We investigated whether demographic, disease-related, or personal baseline determinants can predict a positive response to energy conservation management (ECM).METHOD. We conducted a secondary analysis of a single-blind, two-parallel-arms randomized controlled trial that included ambulatory adults with severe MS-related fatigue. Therapy responders and nonresponders were categorized by Checklist Individual Strength fatigue change scores between baseline and end of treatment. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the determinants of response.RESULTS. Sixty-nine participants were included (ECM group, n = 34; control group, n = 35). In the ECM group, fatigue severity, perception of fatigue, illness cognitions about MS, and social support discrepancies were related to the probability of being a responder.CONCLUSION. The results suggest that people with MS-related fatigue who had a less negative perception of fatigue and who perceived fewer disease benefits and a higher discrepancy in social support had the best response to ECM treatment.

UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=eur_pure&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000474426400005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS

U2 - 10.5014/ajot.2019.032474

DO - 10.5014/ajot.2019.032474

M3 - Article

C2 - 31318668

SN - 0272-9490

VL - 73

JO - American Journal of Occupational Therapy

JF - American Journal of Occupational Therapy

IS - 4

M1 - 7304205040

ER -

Energy Conservation Management for People With Multiple Sclerosis-Related Fatigue: Who Benefits?

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this