Abstract
This paper analyzes the properties of a number of estimators that can be used to estimate short-run persistence in mutual fund returns. When data for different funds are pooled, it is advisable to correct for cross-sectional differences in expected returns. However, these adjustments may induce biases in the estimated persistence coefficients and thus lead to spurious persistence. Theoretical derivations, combined with a Monte Carlo study, show that these biases cannot be neglected for the samples that are typically used in applied work. We also estimate the short-run persistence in two samples of U.S. open-end mutual funds using quarterly returns for 1987-1994. An important conclusion is that the results are quite sensitive to the estimation method that is employed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 646-655 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | The Review of Economics and Statistics |
Volume | 82 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2000 |
Externally published | Yes |
Research programs
- RSM F&A