Abstract
It has been known since at least the golden age of Athens that the form of legal commands should depend in some degree on the quality and volume of the information which lawmakers hold at their disposal. In modern-day EU policy, this proposition is usually taken to mean that, holding all else constant, the Union should pass Directives when uncertainty is high and Regulations when uncertainty is low. Here, we trace the theoretical foundations of that model, and we then refine it by discriminating between two distinct vectors of uncertainty, the axiological and the epistemic. Thereafter, we apply our refined version of the model to several issues of “smart” technology and its regulation. We use these examples to show that, relative to its progenitor, our version of the model captures more of the practical problems that the EU faces, more of the tools of governance that are available to it, and more of the decisions that its officials may plausibly and soon be charged with making.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 65 |
| Journal | Environment Systems and Decisions |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2025.
Erasmus Sectorplan
- Sector plan SSH-Breed
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'EU law in the age of the twin transition: risk, uncertainty, and legal form'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver