Abstract
Background: The Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) and Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC) were developed to improve risk stratification of indeterminate nodules. Our aim was to assess the clinical utility in a European population with restrictive diagnostic workup. Methods: Clinical utility of the GEC was assessed in a prospective multicenter cohort of 68 indeterminate nodules. Diagnostic surgical rates for Bethesda III and IV nodules were compared to a historical cohort of 171 indeterminate nodules. Samples were post hoc tested with the GSC. Results: The GEC classified 26% as benign. Surgical rates between the prospective and historical cohort did not differ (72.1% vs. 76.6%). The GSC classified 59% as benign, but misclassified six malignant lesions as benign. Conclusion: Implementation of GEC in management of indeterminate nodules in a European country with restrictive diagnostic workup is currently not supported, especially in oncocytic nodules. Prospective studies with the GSC in European countries are needed to determine the clinical utility.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2227-2236 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Head and Neck |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| Early online date | 25 Jul 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2023 |
Bibliographical note
ACKNOWLEDGMENT:Logistics of this investigator initiated research project was supported by an unrestricted research grant from Veracyte.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Head & Neck published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'European experience with the Afirma Gene Expression Classifier for indeterminate thyroid nodules: A clinical utility study in the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver