Abstract
The ESOT TLJ 3.0. consensus conference brought together leading experts in transplantation to develop evidence-based guidance on the standardization and clinical utility of pre-implantation kidney biopsy in the assessment of grafts from Expanded Criteria Donors (ECD). Seven themes were selected and underwent in-depth analysis after formulation of PICO (patient/population, intervention, comparison, outcomes) questions. After literature search, the statements for each key question were produced, rated according the GRADE approach [Quality of evidence: High (A), Moderate (B), Low (C); Strength of Recommendation: Strong (1), Weak (2)]. The statements were subsequently presented in-person at the Prague kick-off meeting, discussed and voted. After two rounds of discussion and voting, all 7 statements reached an overall agreement of 100% on the following issues: needle core/wedge/punch technique representatively [B,1], frozen/paraffin embedded section reliability [B,2], experienced/non-experienced on-call renal pathologist reproducibility/accuracy of the histological report [A,1], glomerulosclerosis/other parameters reproducibility [C,2], digital pathology/light microscopy in the measurement of histological variables [A,1], special stainings/Haematoxylin and Eosin alone comparison [A,1], glomerulosclerosis reliability versus other histological parameters to predict the graft survival, graft function, primary non-function [B,1]. This methodology has allowed to reach a full consensus among European experts on important technical topics regarding pre-implantation biopsy in the ECD graft assessment.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 11410 |
Journal | Transplant International |
Volume | 36 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 4 Jul 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:All costs related to taskforce and workgroup meetings were covered by ESOT, without external funding. JB was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) with grant BE-3801.
Funding Information:
All costs related to taskforce and workgroup meetings were covered by ESOT, without external funding. JB was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) with grant BE-3801.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 Zaza, Cucchiari, Becker, de Vries, Eccher, Florquin, Kers, Rabant, Rossini, Pengel, Marson and Furian.