Evaluation of behavioral changes and subjective distress after exposure to coercive inpatient interventions

Irina Georgieva, Niels Mulder, R Whittington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

55 Citations (Scopus)
9 Downloads (Pure)


Background: There is a lack of evidence to underpin decisions on what constitutes the most effective and least restrictive form of coercive intervention when responding to violent behavior. Therefore we compared ratings of effectiveness and subjective distress by 125 inpatients across four types of coercive interventions. Methods: Effectiveness was assessed through ratings of patient behavior immediately after exposure to a coercive measure and 24 h later. Subjective distress was examined using the Coercion Experience Scale at debriefing. Regression analyses were performed to compare these outcome variables across the four types of coercive interventions. Results: Using univariate statistics, no significant differences in effectiveness and subjective distress were found between the groups, except that patients who were involuntarily medicated experienced significant less isolation during the measure than patients who underwent combined measures. However, when controlling for the effect of demographic and clinical characteristics, significant differences on subjective distress between the groups emerged: involuntary medication was experienced as t Conclusions: In the absence of information on individual patient preferences, involuntary medication may be more justified than seclusion and mechanical restraint as a coercive intervention. Use of multiple interventions requires significant justification given their association with significant distress.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
JournalBMC Psychiatry
Issue number54
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this