Evaluation of morbidity and mortality after anastomotic leakage following elective colorectal surgery in patients treated with or without mechanical bowel preparation

Hans pieter Sant, WF Weidema, Hop, Johan Lange, CME Contant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A previous multicenter randomized trial demonstrated that mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) does not guard against anastomotic leakage in elective colorectal surgery. The aim of this complementary study was to evaluate the effects of MBP on morbidity and mortality after anastomotic leakage in elective colorectal surgery. METHODS: A subgroup analysis was performed of a randomized trial comparing the incidence of anastomotic leakage and septic complications with and without MBP in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. RESULTS: Elective colorectal surgery was performed in 1,433 patients with primary anastomoses, of whom 63 patients developed anastomotic leakage. Twenty-eight patients (44%) received MBP and 35 patients (56%) did not. Mortality rate, initial need for surgical reintervention, and extent of bowel contamination did not differ between groups (29% vs 40%; P = .497, P = .667, and P = .998, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: No benefit of MBP was found regarding morbidity and mortality after anastomotic leakage in elective colorectal surgery. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)321-324
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume202
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Research programs

  • EMC MM-03-47-02-A
  • EMC NIHES-01-66-01
  • EMC OR-02-47-12

Cite this