TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of National Surgical Practice for Lateral Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer in an Untrained Setting
AU - Sluckin, Tania C.
AU - Hazen, Sanne Marije J.A.
AU - Dutch Snapshot Research Group
AU - Horsthuis, Karin
AU - Beets-Tan, Regina G.H.
AU - Aalbers, Arend G.J.
AU - Beets, Geerard L.
AU - Boerma, Evert Jan G.
AU - Borstlap, Jaap
AU - van Breest Smallenburg, Vivian
AU - Burger, Jacobus W.A.
AU - Crolla, Rogier M.P.H.
AU - Daniëls-Gooszen, Alette W.
AU - Davids, Paul H.P.
AU - Dunker, Michalda S.
AU - van Gils, Renza A.H.
AU - van Koeverden, Sebastiaan
AU - Oosterling, Steven J.
AU - Rothbarth, Joost
AU - Talsma, Aaldert K.
AU - Vanhooymissen, Inge J.S.
AU - Verdaasdonk, Emiel G.G.
AU - Vermaas, Maarten
AU - de Vries, Marianne
AU - Tanis, Pieter J.
AU - van Aalten, Susanna M.
AU - Antonisse, Imogeen E.
AU - Cate, David W.G.ten
AU - Curutchet, Sam
AU - Dekker, Emmelie N.
AU - Demirkiran, Ahmet
AU - van Egdom, Laurentine S.E.
AU - El-Massoudi, Youssef
AU - van Elderen, Saskia
AU - van den Hoek, Sjoerd
AU - Hoff, Christiaan
AU - Imani, Farshad
AU - Kok, Sylvia
AU - Koster, Ingrid M.
AU - Kroese, Leonard F.
AU - Muller, Karin
AU - Noordman, Bo J.
AU - Olthof, Pim B.
AU - van Rees, Jan M.
AU - Roosen, Lodewijk J.
AU - Spillenaar-Bilgen, Ernst J.
AU - van der Valk, Maxime J.M.
AU - Velema, Laura A.
AU - van Westerveld, Paul P.
AU - Zheng, Kang J.
N1 - Funding Information:
The Snapshot Rectal Cancer 2016 study received funding from the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF; reference number 12768).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/6/20
Y1 - 2023/6/20
N2 - Background: Involved lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) have been associated with increased local recurrence (LR) and ipsi-lateral LR (LLR) rates. However, consensus regarding the indication and type of surgical treatment for suspicious LLNs is lacking. This study evaluated the surgical treatment of LLNs in an untrained setting at a national level. Methods: Patients who underwent additional LLN surgery were selected from a national cross-sectional cohort study regarding patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery in 69 Dutch hospitals in 2016. LLN surgery consisted of either ‘node-picking’ (the removal of an individual LLN) or ‘partial regional node dissection’ (PRND; an incomplete resection of the LLN area). For all patients with primarily enlarged (≥7 mm) LLNs, those undergoing rectal surgery with an additional LLN procedure were compared to those undergoing only rectal resection. Results: Out of 3057 patients, 64 underwent additional LLN surgery, with 4-year LR and LLR rates of 26% and 15%, respectively. Forty-eight patients (75%) had enlarged LLNs, with corresponding recurrence rates of 26% and 19%, respectively. Node-picking (n = 40) resulted in a 20% 4-year LLR, and a 14% LLR after PRND (n = 8; p = 0.677). Multivariable analysis of 158 patients with enlarged LLNs undergoing additional LLN surgery (n = 48) or rectal resection alone (n = 110) showed no significant association of LLN surgery with 4-year LR or LLR, but suggested higher recurrence risks after LLN surgery (LR: hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7–3.2, p = 0.264; LLR: HR 1.9, 95% CI 0.2–2.5, p = 0.874). Conclusion: Evaluation of Dutch practice in 2016 revealed that approximately one-third of patients with primarily enlarged LLNs underwent surgical treatment, mostly consisting of node-picking. Recurrence rates were not significantly affected by LLN surgery, but did suggest worse outcomes. Outcomes of LLN surgery after adequate training requires further research.
AB - Background: Involved lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) have been associated with increased local recurrence (LR) and ipsi-lateral LR (LLR) rates. However, consensus regarding the indication and type of surgical treatment for suspicious LLNs is lacking. This study evaluated the surgical treatment of LLNs in an untrained setting at a national level. Methods: Patients who underwent additional LLN surgery were selected from a national cross-sectional cohort study regarding patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery in 69 Dutch hospitals in 2016. LLN surgery consisted of either ‘node-picking’ (the removal of an individual LLN) or ‘partial regional node dissection’ (PRND; an incomplete resection of the LLN area). For all patients with primarily enlarged (≥7 mm) LLNs, those undergoing rectal surgery with an additional LLN procedure were compared to those undergoing only rectal resection. Results: Out of 3057 patients, 64 underwent additional LLN surgery, with 4-year LR and LLR rates of 26% and 15%, respectively. Forty-eight patients (75%) had enlarged LLNs, with corresponding recurrence rates of 26% and 19%, respectively. Node-picking (n = 40) resulted in a 20% 4-year LLR, and a 14% LLR after PRND (n = 8; p = 0.677). Multivariable analysis of 158 patients with enlarged LLNs undergoing additional LLN surgery (n = 48) or rectal resection alone (n = 110) showed no significant association of LLN surgery with 4-year LR or LLR, but suggested higher recurrence risks after LLN surgery (LR: hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7–3.2, p = 0.264; LLR: HR 1.9, 95% CI 0.2–2.5, p = 0.874). Conclusion: Evaluation of Dutch practice in 2016 revealed that approximately one-third of patients with primarily enlarged LLNs underwent surgical treatment, mostly consisting of node-picking. Recurrence rates were not significantly affected by LLN surgery, but did suggest worse outcomes. Outcomes of LLN surgery after adequate training requires further research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85161677548&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-023-13460-0
DO - 10.1245/s10434-023-13460-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 37340200
AN - SCOPUS:85161677548
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 30
SP - 5472
EP - 5485
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
IS - 9
ER -