Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Exploring clustering of leprosy in the Comoros and Madagascar: A geospatial analysis

  • Nimer Ortuño-Gutiérrez*
  • , Aboubacar Mzembaba
  • , Stéphanie Ramboarina
  • , Randrianantoandro Andriamira
  • , Abdallah Baco
  • , Sofie Braet
  • , Assoumani Younoussa
  • , Bertrand Cauchoix
  • , Zahara Salim
  • , Mohamed Amidy
  • , Saverio Grillone
  • , Tahinamandranto Rasamoelina
  • , Emmanuelle Cambau
  • , Annemieke Geluk
  • , Bouke C. de Jong
  • , Jan Hendrik Richardus
  • , Epco Hasker
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Damien Foundation (Belgium)
  • National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Control Programme
  • Raoul Follereau Foundation
  • National Leprosy Control Program
  • Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp
  • Université d'Antananarivo
  • Université Paris Cité
  • Assistance publique – Hôpitaux de Paris
  • Leiden University Medical Centre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To identify patterns of spatial clustering of leprosy. Design: We performed a baseline survey for a trial on post-exposure prophylaxis for leprosy in Comoros and Madagascar. We screened 64 villages, door-to-door, and recorded results of screening, demographic data and geographic coordinates. To identify clusters, we fitted a purely spatial Poisson model using Kulldorff's spatial scan statistic. We used a regular Poisson model to assess the risk of contracting leprosy at the individual level as a function of distance to the nearest known leprosy patient. Results: We identified 455 leprosy patients; 200 (44.0%) belonged to 2735 households included in a cluster. Thirty-eight percent of leprosy patients versus 10% of the total population live ≤25 m from another leprosy patient. Risk ratios for being diagnosed with leprosy were 7.3, 2.4, 1.8, 1.4 and 1.7, for those at the same household, at 1–<25 m, 25–<50 m, 50–<75 m and 75–<100 m as/from a leprosy patient, respectively, compared to those living at ≥100 m. Conclusions: We documented significant clustering of leprosy beyond household level, although 56% of cases were not part of a cluster. Control measures need to be extended beyond the household, and social networks should be further explored.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)96-101
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases
Volume108
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study is part of the PEOPLE project, which is part of the EDCTP2 programme supported by the European Union (grant number RIA2017NIM-1847-PEOPLE ). The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of EDCTP.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring clustering of leprosy in the Comoros and Madagascar: A geospatial analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this