Exploring the translational challenge for medical applications of ionising radiation and corresponding radiation protection research

Sophie Bockhold*, Shane J. Foley, Louise A. Rainford, Riccardo Corridori, Annika Eberstein, Christoph Hoeschen, Mark W. Konijnenberg, Susan Molyneux-Hodgson, Graciano Paulo, Joana Santos, Jonathan P. McNulty

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Medical applications of ionising radiation and associated radiation protection research often encounter long delays and inconsistent implementation when translated into clinical practice. A coordinated effort is needed to analyse the research needs for innovation transfer in radiation-based high-quality healthcare across Europe which can inform the development of an innovation transfer framework tailored for equitable implementation of radiation research at scale. Methods: Between March and September 2021 a Delphi methodology was employed to gain consensus on key translational challenges from a range of professional stakeholders. A total of three Delphi rounds were conducted using a series of electronic surveys comprised of open-ended and closed-type questions. The surveys were disseminated via the EURAMED Rocc-n-Roll consortium network and prominent medical societies in the field. Approximately 350 professionals were invited to participate. Participants’ level of agreement with each generated statement was captured using a 6-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as median ≥ 4 with ≥ 60% of responses in the upper tertile of the scale. Additionally, the stability of responses across rounds was assessed. Results: In the first Delphi round a multidisciplinary panel of 20 generated 127 unique statements. The second and third Delphi rounds recruited a broader sample of 130 individuals to rate the extent to which they agreed with each statement as a key translational challenge. A total of 60 consensus statements resulted from the iterative Delphi process of which 55 demonstrated good stability. Ten statements were identified as high priority challenges with ≥ 80% of statement ratings either ‘Agree’ or ‘Strongly Agree’. Conclusion: A lack of interoperability between systems, insufficient resources, unsatisfactory education and training, and the need for greater public awareness surrounding the benefits, risks, and applications of ionising radiation were identified as principal translational challenges. These findings will help to inform a tailored innovation transfer framework for medical radiation research.

Original languageEnglish
Article number137
JournalJournal of Translational Medicine
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Mar 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Funding was received from the Euratom research and training programme 2019–2020 under grant agreement No. 899995.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring the translational challenge for medical applications of ionising radiation and corresponding radiation protection research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this