Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

External validation of a model to predict recurrence-free and melanoma-specific survival for patients with melanoma after sentinel node biopsy

  • Robert C. Stassen*
  • , Sentinel Lymph Node Working Grp
  • , Carolien C. H. M. Maas
  • , Mohammed Kashani-Sabet
  • , Stanley P. Leong
  • , Richard L. White
  • , Barbara A. Pockaj
  • , Jonathan S. Zager
  • , Schlomo Schneebaum
  • , John T. Vetto
  • , Eli Avisar
  • , J. Harrison Howard
  • , Cristina O'Donoghue
  • , Heidi Kosiorek
  • , Alexander C. J. van Akkooi
  • , Cornelis Verhoef
  • , David van Klaveren
  • , Dirk J. Grunhagen
  • , Roger Olofsson Bagge
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • California Pacific Medical Center
  • Carolinas Medical Center
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
  • Tel Aviv University
  • Oregon Health and Science University
  • University of Miami
  • University of South Alabama
  • Rush University
  • The University of Sydney
  • Alfred Hospital
  • University of Gothenburg
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
56 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Recently, a model to predict 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was published. The aim of this study was to validate that model in a large independent international cohort. Methods: The database of the Sentinel Lymph Node Working Group (SLNWG) was analysed for patients with malignant melanoma who underwent SLNB. Patients with clinical stage III melanoma, a history of other malignancies, or receiving concomitant systemic therapies during follow-up were excluded. The model's predictive performance was evaluated using discrimination and calibration metrics in the eligible cohort. Decision curve analysis was performed to assess the clinical value of the model. Results: The external validation cohort consisted of 6174 patients of the SLNWG from the USA, Europe, and Israel. A positive sentinel node was found in 788 patients (12.8%). The area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the external validation was 0.76 (95% c.i. 0.74 to 0.77) for RFS and 0.79 (95% c.i. 0.76 to 0.81) for MSS. The model was well calibrated, as the observed 5-year survival rates aligned closely with the predicted survival rates (calibration slope of 0.98 for RFS and calibration slope of 0.99 for MSS). The model provided a net benefit versus the 'treat all' and 'treat none' strategies at the predetermined probability threshold for recurrence of 45%. Conclusion: The model demonstrated good performance in a large heterogeneous independent cohort, emphasizing its robustness. Decision curve analysis revealed a clear net benefit of the model over a treat all strategy, highlighting its potential for clinical use.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberznaf037
Number of pages9
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume112
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'External validation of a model to predict recurrence-free and melanoma-specific survival for patients with melanoma after sentinel node biopsy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this