Fasting protects against the side effects of irinotecan treatment but does not affect anti-tumour activity in mice

Sander Huisman, Peter de Bruijn, Inge Helmantel, J.N.M. IJzermans, Erik Wiemer, Ron Mathijssen, Ron de Bruin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BackgroundThe main limitation to the use of irinotecan in the treatment of colorectal cancer is the severity of side effects, including neutropaenia and diarrhoea. Here, we explored the effects of 3days of fasting on irinotecan-induced toxicities, on plasma, liver and tumour pharmacokinetics and on anti-tumour activity in mice. Experimental ApproachMale BALB/c mice received C26 colon carcinoma cells subcutaneously. They were randomized 1:1 into equally sized ad libitum fed and fasted groups after which they were treated with irinotecan. Weight and adverse side effects were recorded daily. At the end of the experiment, tumours were resected and weighed, and concentrations of irinotecan and its active metabolite SN-38 were determined in plasma and tumour. Key ResultsFasting prevented the diarrhoea and visible signs of discomfort induced by irinotecan. Ad libitum fed animals developed leucopenia compared with untreated controls, whereas fasted mice did not. Irinotecan suppressed tumour growth equally in both treated groups, compared with untreated controls. Levels of the active irinotecan metabolite SN-38 9 (calculated as AUC values) were significantly lower in fasted mice in both plasma and liver, but not in tumour tissue. Conclusions and ImplicationsFasting protected against irinotecan-induced side effects without interfering with its anti-tumour efficacy. Fasting induced a lower systemic exposure to SN-38, which may explain the absence of adverse side effects, while tumour levels of SN-38 remained unchanged. These data offer important new approaches to improve treatment with irinotecan in patients.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)804-814
Number of pages11
JournalBritish Journal of Pharmacology
Volume173
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Cite this