TY - JOUR
T1 - Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study
AU - Iglesias-Garcia, J
AU - Poley, Jan-werner
AU - Larghi, A
AU - Giovannini, M
AU - Petrone, MC
AU - Abdulkader, I
AU - Monges, G
AU - Costamagna, G
AU - Arcidiacono, P
AU - Biermann, Katharina
AU - Rindi, G
AU - Bories, E
AU - Dogloni, C
AU - Bruno, Marco
AU - Dominguez-Munoz, JE
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Background: EUS-guided FNA is an efficacious technique for sampling intraintestinal and extraintestinal mass lesions. However, cytology has limitations to its final yield and accuracy, which may be overcome if histological specimens are provided to the pathologist. Objective: To evaluate feasibility, yield, and diagnostic accuracy of a newly developed 19-gauge, fine-needle biopsy (FIB) device. Design: Multicenter, pooled, cohort study. Setting: Five medical centers. Patients: This study involved 109 consecutive patients with 114 intraintestinal or extraintestinal mass lesions and/or pen-intestinal lymph nodes. Intervention: EUS-guided FNB (EUS-FNB) with a newly developed, 19-gauge, FNB device. Main Outcome Measurements: Percentage of cases in which pathologists classified the sample quality as optimal for histological evaluation and the overall diagnostic accuracy compared with a composite criterion-standard diagnosis. Results: We evaluated 114 lesions (mean [+/- standard deviation] size 35.1 +/- 18.7 mm; 84 malignant [73.7%] and 30 [26.3%] benign). EUS-ENB was technically feasible in 112 lesions (98.24%). Sample quality was adequate for full histological assessment in 102 lesions (89.47%). In 98 cases (85.96%), diagnosis proved to he correct according to criterion-standard diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy for diagnosis of malignancy were 90.2%, 100%, 100%, 78.9%, and 92.9%, respectively. Limitations: Use of a surrogate criterion-standard diagnosis, including clinical follow-up when no surgical specimens were available, mainly in benign diagnoses.
AB - Background: EUS-guided FNA is an efficacious technique for sampling intraintestinal and extraintestinal mass lesions. However, cytology has limitations to its final yield and accuracy, which may be overcome if histological specimens are provided to the pathologist. Objective: To evaluate feasibility, yield, and diagnostic accuracy of a newly developed 19-gauge, fine-needle biopsy (FIB) device. Design: Multicenter, pooled, cohort study. Setting: Five medical centers. Patients: This study involved 109 consecutive patients with 114 intraintestinal or extraintestinal mass lesions and/or pen-intestinal lymph nodes. Intervention: EUS-guided FNB (EUS-FNB) with a newly developed, 19-gauge, FNB device. Main Outcome Measurements: Percentage of cases in which pathologists classified the sample quality as optimal for histological evaluation and the overall diagnostic accuracy compared with a composite criterion-standard diagnosis. Results: We evaluated 114 lesions (mean [+/- standard deviation] size 35.1 +/- 18.7 mm; 84 malignant [73.7%] and 30 [26.3%] benign). EUS-ENB was technically feasible in 112 lesions (98.24%). Sample quality was adequate for full histological assessment in 102 lesions (89.47%). In 98 cases (85.96%), diagnosis proved to he correct according to criterion-standard diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy for diagnosis of malignancy were 90.2%, 100%, 100%, 78.9%, and 92.9%, respectively. Limitations: Use of a surrogate criterion-standard diagnosis, including clinical follow-up when no surgical specimens were available, mainly in benign diagnoses.
U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.053
DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.053
M3 - Article
SN - 0016-5107
VL - 73
SP - 1189
EP - 1196
JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
IS - 6
ER -