Firm Reputation and investment decisions: The contigency role of securitie analysts' recommendations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Moving beyond resource-based consequences of a firm's reputation, we develop a behavioral perspective on the impact of corporate reputation. Although there has been extensive discussion in previous studies of the benefits of reputation in terms of gaining resource advantages, we apply theory on self-regulatory focus to suggest that highly reputable firms may tend to have a prevention focus rather than a promotion focus in their investment strategies. This tendency will lead the firm to opt for low-risk investments rather than high-risk investments. Furthermore, we develop a contingency model and argue that the main effect of reputation on the investment decisions of the firm is further strengthened by the negative recommendations of securities analysts. We find support for our hypotheses. In doing so, we address emerging theories about the potential negative consequences of a firm's reputation and provide important insights for our theoretical understanding of the behavior of highly reputable firms.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)680-692
Number of pages13
JournalLong Range Planning
Volume51
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Aug 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Firm Reputation and investment decisions: The contigency role of securitie analysts' recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this