Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

First-line chemotherapy in advanced intra-abdominal well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma: An EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group retrospective analysis

  • Silvia Stacchiotti*
  • , Winette T.A. Van der Graaf
  • , Roberta G. Sanfilippo
  • , Sandrine I. Marreaud
  • , Winan J. Van Houdt
  • , Ian R. Judson
  • , Alessandro Gronchi
  • , Hans Gelderblom
  • , Saskia Litiere
  • , Bernd Kasper
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale per lo studio e la cura dei tumori - Milano
  • European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Data Center
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • Institute of Cancer Research (ICR), London
  • Leiden University Medical Centre
  • Heidelberg University 

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No prospective trial with anthracycline-based chemotherapy has individually assessed response in a well-differentiated (WD)/dedifferentiated (DD) liposarcoma patient cohort. We conducted a retrospective analysis of first-line chemotherapy in liposarcoma of intra-abdominal origin (IA-LPS) in patients who had entered the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG) trials. METHODS: We searched for all adult patients treated with first-line chemotherapy for advanced IA-LPS in the EORTC STBSG phase 2 and 3 trials from 1978. Treatment was aggregated into 5 groups: anthracycline alone, ifosfamide alone, doxorubicin plus ifosfamide (D+IFO), doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/vincristine/dacarbazine, and “other” (brostallicin, trabectedin). Response was assessed prospectively by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors or World Health Organization criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were computed by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients with IA-LPS from 13 trials were identified (104 evaluable for response). Overall, there were 10/109 (9.2%) responders: 3/48 (6.3%) in the anthracycline alone group, 2/15 (13%) in the ifosfamide alone group, and 4/18 (22%) in the D+IFO group. At the 10-month median follow-up (interquartile range, 6-24), the median OS was 19 months (95% CI, 15-21) and median PFS 4 months (95% CI, 3-6). D+IFO achieved a not statistically significant longer median PFS (12 months) and median OS (31 months) than observed with other regimens. Univariate/multivariate analysis did not identify prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Cytotoxic chemotherapy, in particular anthracycline alone, had marginal activity in advanced IA-LPS. Ifosfamide-containing regimens showed higher activity, although it was not statistically significant and in a small number of cases, with the combination of doxorubicin and ifosfamide appearing to be the more active regimen available in fit patients. This series provides a benchmark for future trials on new drugs in WD/DD liposarcoma.;.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2932-2938
Number of pages7
JournalCancer
Volume128
Issue number15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This publication was supported by the EORTC Cancer Research Fund (ECRF).

Publisher Copyright: © 2022 American Cancer Society.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'First-line chemotherapy in advanced intra-abdominal well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma: An EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group retrospective analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this