Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Fracture Risk and Management of Discontinuation of Denosumab Therapy: A Systematic Review and Position Statement by ECTS

  • E Tsourdi
  • , M.C. Zillikens
  • , C Meier
  • , JJ Body
  • , EG Rodriguez
  • , AD Anastasilakis
  • , B Abrahamsen
  • , E McCloskey
  • , LC Hofbauer
  • , N Guanabens
  • , B Obermayer-Pietsch
  • , SH Ralston
  • , R Eastell
  • , J Pepe
  • , A Palermo
  • , B Langdahl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

298 Citations (Scopus)
708 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Context: Denosumab discontinuation is characterized by an increase in bone turnover overriding pretreatment status, a rapid bone loss in the majority and multiple vertebral fractures (VFx) in some patients. Methods: A working group of the European Calcified Tissue Society performed an updated systematic review of existing literature on changes of bone turnover, bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture risk after denosumab discontinuation and provided advice on management based on expert opinion. Results: Important risk factors for multiple VFx following denosumab cessation are prevalent VFx, longer duration off therapy, greater gain in hip BMD during therapy, and greater loss of hip BMD after therapy according to a retrospective analysis of the FREEDOM Extension Study. Case series indicate that prior bisphosphonate therapy mitigates the biochemical rebound phenomenon after denosumab discontinuation, but it is uncertain whether this attenuation prevents BMD loss and fractures. Current evidence indicates partial efficacy of subsequent antiresorptive treatment with results seemingly dependent on duration of denosumab treatment. Conclusions: A careful assessment of indications to start denosumab treatment is advised, especially for younger patients. A case for long-term treatment with denosumab can be made for patients at high fracture risk already on denosumab treatment given the favorable efficacy and safety profile. In case of denosumab discontinuation, alternative antiresorptive treatment should be initiated 6 months after the final denosumab injection. Assessment of bone turnover markers may help define the optimal regimen, pending results of ongoing randomized controlled trials. Patients who have sustained VFx should be offered prompt treatment to reduce high bone turnover.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)264-281
Number of pages18
JournalThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
Volume106
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Dr Tsourdi has received research funding from MSD; honoraria for lectures from Amgen, UCB, Shire, and Kyowa Kirin; and educational grants from Shire and UCB. Prof Zillikens has received honoraria for lectures or advice from Amgen, Kyowa Kirin, Eli Lilly, Shire, and UCB. Prof Meier has received consultancy/ research funding from Amgen, Eli Lilly, Gedeon Richter, Roche Diagnostics, and UCB. Prof Body has received consultancy fees from Amgen and Sandoz. Dr Gonzalez Rodriguez has nothing to disclose. Dr Anastasilakis has received lecture fees from Amgen, Eli Lilly, and VIANEX. Prof Abrahamsen has received institutional research grants from UCB, Novartis, and Kyowa Kirin UK; and consulting or speaker fees from UCB, Kyowa Kirin UK, Amgen, and Eli Lilly. Prof McCloskey has received research funding from Amgen, Consilient Healthcare, GSK, Hologic, I3 Innovus, Internis, IOF, Lilly, Merck, MRC, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, UCB, Unilever, and Versus Arthritis, as well as advisory board or speakers fees from Amgen, ActiveSignal, AstraZeneca, Consilient Healthcare, Fresenius Kabi, GSK, Hologic, Lilly, Synexus, and UCB. Prof Hofbauer has received consultancy fees from Alexion, Amgen, Shire, and UCB and support for clinical studies for his institution from Amgen, Alexion, Ascendis, and Shire. Dr Guañabens has received honoraria for advisory boards or lectures from Amgen, Eli Lilly, and UCB. Prof Obermayer-Pietsch has received research funding from IDS and ViennaLab; and educational grants and lecture and advisory board honoraria from Gedeon Richter, IDS, Shire, and Kyowa Kirin. Prof Ralston has received research funding to his institution from Eli Lilly, Amgen/UCB, and Kyowa Kirin. Prof Eastell has received consultancy funding from IDS, Roche Diagnostics, GSK Nutrition, FNIH, Mereo, Lilly, Sandoz, Nittobo, Abbvie, Samsung, Haoma Medica, CL Bio, Biocon, Lyramid, and Viking; and grant funding from Nittobo, IDS, Roche, Amgen, and Alexion. Dr Pepe has nothing to disclose. Dr Palermo has received lecture fees and research funding from Amgen. Prof Langdahl has received research funding from Amgen and Novo Nordisk; and honoraria for advisory board and lectures from Amgen, UCB, Eli Lilly, Gedeon-Richter, and Gilead.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Research programs

  • EMC OR-01

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fracture Risk and Management of Discontinuation of Denosumab Therapy: A Systematic Review and Position Statement by ECTS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this