Framing pension reform in the news: Traditional versus social media

Linda van den Heijkant, Martine van Selm, Iina Hellsten, Rens Vliegenthart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Social media are increasingly important in the news menu of media users. Differences in news production processes between traditional and social media may lead to differences in how political and social issues are depicted, and this may, eventually, have consequences for the information that reaches citizens about an issue. Against this background, this study compares content across the two media types to examine whether and how the framing of a sociopolitical issue differs between newspaper articles and posts on social media. The empirical analyses are based on a content analysis of newspaper articles (n = 414) and social media messages (n = 2,771) conducted in the context of the socially contested issue of raising the retirement age in the Netherlands. Findings suggest that different content production processes can still lead to similar outcomes as both media types emphasize problems with (instead of solutions to) the retirement age issue. Our findings also confirm differences across traditional and social media, although these differences are substantially relatively small. While traditional news media emphasize conflict-related frames more often than social media, social media present more frame diversity in solutions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)249-272
Number of pages24
JournalCommunications
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 May 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.

Research programs

  • ESHCC M&C

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Framing pension reform in the news: Traditional versus social media'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this