Full compensation and the volume effect: assessing different policy options

Franziska Weber, Peter van Wijck*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

101 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

According to the Damages Directive victims of infringements of competition
law are entitled to full compensation. To achieve this goal overcharges,
passing-on, and volume effects should play a role in the calculation of
damages (for any purchaser who is not yet the final consumer). Whereas the
Damages Directive promotes the passing-on defence for the defendants, it
does not regulate volume effects in depth. The computation of these effects
requires information on counterfactual prices and quantities. Since this
information cannot be observed, the size of the volume effect tends to be
uncertain. This paper discusses policy-options that aspire to bring
compensation closer to full compensation, given uncertainty about the size
of the volume effect. Based on the maximin-principle, a principle for
decision-making under uncertainty, not allowing a passing-on defence
appears to be an attractive option since this may lead to the minimization of
the maximum gap between actual and full compensation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)367-392
JournalEuropean Competition Journal
Volume20
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Nominated, 2024 Antitrust Writing Awards: Academic, Private Enforcement

© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Full compensation and the volume effect: assessing different policy options'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this