Abstract
We examine the risk and return characteristics of fundamental weighting
schemes for developed, emerging, and frontier government bond markets and compare
these to market-capitalization-weighted indexes. We document positive excess returns for
the investment grade sample only when currency risks are not hedged, suggesting that
fundamentals might be more important for currency rather than bond returns. For emerging
and frontier markets, we find positive excess returns for fundamental weighting schemes,
although not always statistically significant. The excess returns from fundamental weighting
schemes for government bonds can be explained by standard factors from equity, currency,
or bond markets.
schemes for developed, emerging, and frontier government bond markets and compare
these to market-capitalization-weighted indexes. We document positive excess returns for
the investment grade sample only when currency risks are not hedged, suggesting that
fundamentals might be more important for currency rather than bond returns. For emerging
and frontier markets, we find positive excess returns for fundamental weighting schemes,
although not always statistically significant. The excess returns from fundamental weighting
schemes for government bonds can be explained by standard factors from equity, currency,
or bond markets.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 405-420 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of Asset Management |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2017 |
Research programs
- ESE - F&A