TY - JOUR
T1 - Gender differences in choice reaction time
T2 - Evidence for differential strategies
AU - Adam, J. J.
AU - Paas, F. G.W.C.
AU - Buekers, M. J.
AU - Wuyts, I. J.
AU - Spijkers, W. A.C.
AU - Wallmeyer, P.
PY - 1999/2
Y1 - 1999/2
N2 - This study considered the hypothesis that on some tasks men and women might employ different information processing strategies. Twelve male and 12 female participants performed a 2- and 4-choice, compatible and incompatible, choice reaction time task that required a verbal response to a spatial location target stimulus. Results demonstrated a near-significant overall reaction time advantage for male participants. Moreover, males and females showed a differential pattern of reaction time as a function of stimulus location. Specifically, in the 4-choice-compatible condition, females exhibited a linear increase in reaction time as a function of the left-right dimension; males, on the other hand, showed a two-component, step-like increase. It was suggested that this gender difference in reaction time performance may reflect differences in processing strategy. Specifically, it was argued that in the present task females may have employed a serial, left-to-right, processing strategy, and males a binary, split-half (dichotomizing) strategy.
AB - This study considered the hypothesis that on some tasks men and women might employ different information processing strategies. Twelve male and 12 female participants performed a 2- and 4-choice, compatible and incompatible, choice reaction time task that required a verbal response to a spatial location target stimulus. Results demonstrated a near-significant overall reaction time advantage for male participants. Moreover, males and females showed a differential pattern of reaction time as a function of stimulus location. Specifically, in the 4-choice-compatible condition, females exhibited a linear increase in reaction time as a function of the left-right dimension; males, on the other hand, showed a two-component, step-like increase. It was suggested that this gender difference in reaction time performance may reflect differences in processing strategy. Specifically, it was argued that in the present task females may have employed a serial, left-to-right, processing strategy, and males a binary, split-half (dichotomizing) strategy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032903389&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/001401399185685
DO - 10.1080/001401399185685
M3 - Article
C2 - 10024851
AN - SCOPUS:0032903389
SN - 0014-0139
VL - 42
SP - 327
EP - 335
JO - Ergonomics
JF - Ergonomics
IS - 2
ER -