Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Genetic Aspects and Molecular Testing in Prostate Cancer: A Report from a Dutch Multidisciplinary Consensus Meeting

*Corresponding author for this work
  • Department of Medical Oncology
  • University Medical Centre Utrecht
  • Centre for Decision Analysis and Support
  • VU University Medical Center
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
  • Department of Radiology
  • Department of Internal Medicine
  • Bravis Hospital
  • Department of Medical Imaging
  • Leiden University Medical Centre
  • Department of Pathology
  • University Medical Centre Groningen
  • Aarhus University Hospital
  • Department of Radiation Oncology
  • GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction
  • Ismar Healthcare
  • St. Antonius Ziekenhuis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
168 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: 

Germline and tumour genetic testing in prostate cancer (PCa) is becoming more broadly accepted, but testing indications and clinical consequences for carriers in each disease stage are not yet well defined.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the consensus of a Dutch multidisciplinary expert panel on the indication and application of germline and tumour genetic testing in PCa.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 

The panel consisted of 39 specialists involved in PCa management. We used a modified Delphi method consisting of two voting rounds and a virtual consensus meeting.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: 

Consensus was reached if ≥75% of the panellists chose the same option. Appropriateness was assessed by the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS:

 Of the multiple-choice questions, 44% reached consensus. For men without PCa having a relevant family history (familial PCa/BRCA-related hereditary cancer), follow-up by prostate-specific antigen was considered appropriate. For patients with low-risk localised PCa and a family history of PCa, active surveillance was considered appropriate, except in case of the patient being a BRCA2 germline pathogenic variant carrier. Germline and tumour genetic testing should not be done for nonmetastatic hormone-sensitive PCa in the absence of a relevant family history of cancer. Tumour genetic testing was deemed most appropriate for the identification of actionable variants, with uncertainty for germline testing. For tumour genetic testing in metastatic castration-resistant PCa, consensus was not reached for the timing and panel composition. The principal limitations are as follows: (1) a number of topics discussed lack scientific evidence, and therefore the recommendations are partly opinion based, and (2) there was a small number of experts per discipline.

CONCLUSIONS: 

The outcomes of this Dutch consensus meeting may provide further guidance on genetic counselling and molecular testing related to PCa.

PATIENT SUMMARY: 

A group of Dutch specialists discussed the use of germline and tumour genetic testing in prostate cancer (PCa) patients, indication of these tests (which patients and when), and impact of these tests on the management and treatment of PCa.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-31
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Urology Open Science
Volume49
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding/Support and role of the sponsor:
The consensus study was
funded by Astellas Pharma B.V., but this company had no influence on
the content in any stage of the process.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s)

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Genetic Aspects and Molecular Testing in Prostate Cancer: A Report from a Dutch Multidisciplinary Consensus Meeting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this