Genotype–Phenotype Relations for the Atypical Parkinsonism Genes: MDSGene Systematic Review

Christina Wittke, Sonja Petkovic, Valerija Dobricic, Susen Schaake, MDS-endorsed PSP Study Group, Gesine Respondek, Anne Weissbach, Harutyun Madoev, Joanne Trinh, Eva Juliane Vollstedt, Neele Kuhnke, Katja Lohmann, Marija Dulovic Mahlow, Connie Marras, Inke R. König, Maria Stamelou, Vincenzo Bonifati, Christina M. Lill, Meike Kasten, Hans Jürgen HuppertzGünter Höglinger, Christine Klein*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)
71 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This Movement Disorder Society Genetic mutation database Systematic Review focuses on monogenic atypical parkinsonism with mutations in the ATP13A2, DCTN1, DNAJC6, FBXO7, SYNJ1, and VPS13C genes. We screened 673 citations and extracted genotypic and phenotypic data for 140 patients (73 families) from 77 publications. In an exploratory fashion, we applied an automated classification procedure via an ensemble of bootstrap-aggregated (“bagged”) decision trees to distinguish these 6 forms of monogenic atypical parkinsonism and found a high accuracy of 86.5% (95%CI, 86.3%–86.7%) based on the following 10 clinical variables: age at onset, spasticity and pyramidal signs, hypoventilation, decreased body weight, minimyoclonus, vertical gaze palsy, autonomic symptoms, other nonmotor symptoms, levodopa response quantification, and cognitive decline. Comparing monogenic atypical with monogenic typical parkinsonism using 2063 data sets from Movement Disorder Society Genetic mutation database on patients with SNCA, LRRK2, VPS35, Parkin, PINK1, and DJ-1 mutations, the age at onset was earlier in monogenic atypical parkinsonism (24 vs 40 years; P = 1.2647 × 10−12) and levodopa response less favorable than in patients with monogenic typical presentations (49% vs 93%). In addition, we compared monogenic to nonmonogenic atypical parkinsonism using data from 362 patients with progressive supranuclear gaze palsy, corticobasal degeneration, multiple system atrophy, or frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Although these conditions share many clinical features with the monogenic atypical forms, they can typically be distinguished based on their later median age at onset (64 years; IQR, 57–70 years). In conclusion, age at onset, presence of specific signs, and degree of levodopa response inform differential diagnostic considerations and genetic testing indications in atypical forms of parkinsonism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1499-1510
Number of pages12
JournalMovement Disorders
Volume36
Issue number7
Early online date19 Mar 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
MDSGene is supported by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. We thank Maren Berens and Kinga Murzewitz for graphical assistance.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Genotype–Phenotype Relations for the Atypical Parkinsonism Genes: MDSGene Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this