Going high and low: on pluralism and neutrality in human embryology policy-making

Hafez Ismaili M'Hamdi*, Nicolas C. Rivron, Eva C.A. Asscher

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Formulating sound and acceptable embryo research policy remains challenging especially in a pluralistic world. This challenge has acquired a new dimension of complexity with the advent of so-called embryo models, which are derived from stem cells. In this article, we present a normative strategy to facilitate the process of sound policy-making in the field of human embryology. This strategy involves seeking neutral agreements on higher level theories and doctrines as well as seeking agreements on the level of concrete policy proposals. We call this strategy: going high and low. By going high and low, the plurality of reasonable moral and epistemic convictions of stakeholders involved in the domain of human embryology is respected while the process of policy-making in this area is improved.

Original languageEnglish
Article number108515
Pages (from-to)846-854
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume50
Issue number12
Early online date8 Dec 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Dec 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Going high and low: on pluralism and neutrality in human embryology policy-making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this