Guest editorial on "International business responses to institutional voids"

JP Doh, Suzana Rodrigues, A Saka-Helmhout, MV Makhija

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

207 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For nearly two decades, scholars in international business and management have explored the implications of institutional voids for firm strategy and structure. Although institutional voids offer both opportunities and challenges, they have largely been associated with firms' efforts to avoid or mitigate institutional deficiencies and reduce the transaction costs associated with operating in settings subject to those institutional shortcomings. The goal of this special issue is to advance scholarship on this topic by (a) exploring institutional voids that are new to the literature, (b) providing a deeper assessment of the different ways in which firms respond to these voids, and (c) utilizing diverse disciplines and theoretical approaches to do so. In this introduction, we first review and synthesize extant research on institutional voids, tracking the evolution of institutional void scholarship since the inception of the concept (Khanna & Palepu, Journal of Economic Literature, 45(2):331-372, 1997) and providing our perspective on its contributions and limitations. We then summarize the contributions of the articles included in this special issue. In addition to identifying an array of institutional voids - economic and social - the articles highlight four different strategies for responding to them: internalization, substitution, borrowing and signaling. Drawing on these, we develop new insights on the implications of institutional voids for firm behavior. We conclude with suggestions for future research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)293-307
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of International Business Studies
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Guest editorial on "International business responses to institutional voids"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this