How are regulatory oversight organisations using long-term care performance indicators: a qualitative descriptive study in 10 high-income countries

Mircha Poldrugovac, Anne Margriet Pot, Niek Klazinga, Dionne Kringos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Regulatory oversight organisations play an important role in quality stewardship in long-term care (LTC) facilities. Performance indicators are a key tool for any quality-related work. Our aim was to better understand how and what performance indicators are used by regulatory oversight organisations for long-term care facilities oversight and which features are affecting their fitness for use. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We explored the use of LTC facility performance indicators by 10 regulatory oversight organisations from England, Ireland, Malta, New Zealand, Norway, Scotland, Singapore, Slovenia, Sweden and the Netherlands. We collected information by means of a questionnaire, 13 follow-up interviews with 20 experts from these organisations and document review. RESULTS: Performance indicators are used by participating oversight organisations to choose priority topics for audits, prioritise facilities to be audited and to identify areas within an audited facility, that require more attention. The indicators of most interest to oversight organisations are related to the dimensions of care articulated in the preset requirements on which audits are based. When the purpose of using indicators is to design a risk assessment model, the fitness for use of indicators ultimately depends on their ability to predict non-compliances on subsequent audits. When indicators are used directly by auditors, the ease of access, clear guidance to evaluate the data and the provision of contextual information are used by oversight organisations to increase fitness for use. CONCLUSIONS: Oversight organisations do not use LTC facility performance indicators to assess quality, but rather to assess the risk of lower quality or of non-compliance with requirements. This risk-related purpose has to be considered when the indicators used in oversight are chosen and when other aspects of fitness for use, such as data analysis and displaying findings, are developed.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere067495
JournalBMJ Open
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Feb 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding This work was supported by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme within the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training
Network (HealthPros—Healthcare Performance Intelligence Professionals) under grant agreement number 765141.

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How are regulatory oversight organisations using long-term care performance indicators: a qualitative descriptive study in 10 high-income countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this