Abstract
Criminology has a strong potential to impact criminal justice policy. It is thought that criminology fails to shape policy because of the political context of such policies. The present study analyses, however, whether criminological knowledge has the capacity to shape policy decision making in the absence of an explicit political context. We do so through a vignette study (N = 212) comparing how participants make criminal sanction policy decisions with or without reading criminological findings about the deterrent effect of longer sentences and whether this can be influenced by making harm to victims salient. The study finds that criminological science can impact policy decision making outside an explicit political context, also with salient harm to victims. Our findings show that when there is no explicit political context present, criminological evidence does affect policy making, even when there is a countervailing factor such as victim salience. This shows that the science in of itself need not be the obstacle to better alignment with policy. The study offers a new research agenda to further generalize these results and to work towards a better incorporation of criminology in criminal justice policy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - 18 Oct 2023 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
JEL Classification: K40, K42UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How criminology affects punishment: Analyzing conditions under which scientific information affects sanction policy decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver