TY - JOUR
T1 - How do we detect and respond to clinical deterioration in hospitalized children?
T2 - Results of the Pediatric Care BefOre Deterioration Events (CODE) survey
AU - O'Halloran, Amanda
AU - Lockwood, Justin
AU - the pediRES-Q Investigators
AU - Sosa, Tina
AU - Gawronski, Orsola
AU - Nadkarni, Vinay
AU - Kleinman, Monica
AU - Dewan, Maya
AU - Abulebda, Kamal
AU - Atkins, Diane
AU - Balikai, Shilpa
AU - Berg, Marc
AU - Berg, Robert
AU - Braga, Matthew S.
AU - Buysse, Corinne
AU - Cheng, Adam
AU - Christoff, Andrea
AU - Corbett, Kelly
AU - DeCaen, Allan
AU - LaShoto, Destiny
AU - deJong, Gabry
AU - del Castillo, Jimena
AU - Dewan, Maya
AU - Donoghue, Aaron
AU - Esangbedo, Ivie
AU - Friess, Stuart
AU - Gangadharan, Sandeep
AU - Gawronski, Orsola
AU - Gilleland, Jonathan
AU - Griffis, Heather
AU - Gray, James
AU - Harvey, Helen
AU - Harwayne-Gidansky, Ilana
AU - Haskell, Sarah
AU - Hayes, Jennifer
AU - Heber, Kiran
AU - Hunt, Betsy
AU - Ikeyama, Takanari
AU - Jani, Priti
AU - Kleinman, Monica
AU - Knight, Lynda
AU - Kurosawa, Hiroshi
AU - Lauridsen, Kasper Glerup
AU - Lemoine, Tara
AU - Maa, Tensing
AU - Masse, Elizabeth
AU - Mejia, Luz Marina
AU - Mok, Yee Hui
AU - Morgan, Ryan W.
AU - Nadkarni, Vinay
AU - Nett, Sholeen
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 Society of Hospital Medicine.
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Systems to detect and respond to deteriorating hospitalized children are common despite little evidence supporting best practices. Our objective was to describe systems to detect/respond to deteriorating hospitalized children at Pediatric Resuscitation Quality Collaborative (pediRES-Q) institutions. We performed a cross-sectional survey of pediRES-Q leaders. Questionnaire design utilized expert validation and cognitive interviews. Thirty centers (88%) responded. Most (93%) used ≥1 system to detect deterioration: most commonly, early warning scores (83%), watcher lists (55%), and proactive surveillance teams (31%). Most (90%) had a team to respond to deteriorating patients and the majority of teams could be activated by clinician or family concerns. Most institutions (90%) collect relevant data, including number of rapid responses (88%), arrests outside intensive care units (100%), and serious safety events (88%). In conclusion, most pediRES-Q institutions utilize systems to detect/respond to deteriorating hospitalized children. Heterogeneity exists among programs. Rigorous evaluation is needed to identify best practices.
AB - Systems to detect and respond to deteriorating hospitalized children are common despite little evidence supporting best practices. Our objective was to describe systems to detect/respond to deteriorating hospitalized children at Pediatric Resuscitation Quality Collaborative (pediRES-Q) institutions. We performed a cross-sectional survey of pediRES-Q leaders. Questionnaire design utilized expert validation and cognitive interviews. Thirty centers (88%) responded. Most (93%) used ≥1 system to detect deterioration: most commonly, early warning scores (83%), watcher lists (55%), and proactive surveillance teams (31%). Most (90%) had a team to respond to deteriorating patients and the majority of teams could be activated by clinician or family concerns. Most institutions (90%) collect relevant data, including number of rapid responses (88%), arrests outside intensive care units (100%), and serious safety events (88%). In conclusion, most pediRES-Q institutions utilize systems to detect/respond to deteriorating hospitalized children. Heterogeneity exists among programs. Rigorous evaluation is needed to identify best practices.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174386529&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jhm.13224
DO - 10.1002/jhm.13224
M3 - Article
C2 - 37861210
AN - SCOPUS:85174386529
SN - 1553-5592
VL - 18
SP - 1102
EP - 1108
JO - Journal of Hospital Medicine
JF - Journal of Hospital Medicine
IS - 12
ER -