How embodied cognitions affect judgments: Height-related attribution bias in football foul calls

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many fouls committed in football (called soccer in some countries) are ambiguous, and there is no objective way of determining who is the “true” perpetrator or the “true” victim. Consequently, fans as well as referees often rely on a variety of decision cues when judging such foul situations. Based on embodiment research, which links perceptions of height to concepts of strength, power, and aggression, we argue that height is going to be one of the decision cues used. As a result, people are more likely to attribute a foul in an ambiguous tackle situation to the taller of two players. We find consistent support for our hypothesis, not only in field data spanning the last seven UEFA Champions League and German Bundesliga seasons, as well as the last three FIFA World Cups, but also in two experimental studies. The resulting dilemma for refereeing in practice is discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-22
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Sport & Exercise Psychology
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How embodied cognitions affect judgments: Height-related attribution bias in football foul calls'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this