Abstract
Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is more sensitive than cytology for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). We evaluated the performance of high-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing in routine screening.Methods:In all, 25 871 women (29-61) enrolled in our population-based cohort study were offered both cytology and hrHPV testing. High-risk HPV-positive women with normal cytology and an age-matched subcohort of hrHPV-negative women with normal cytology were invited for repeat testing after 1 and/or 2 years and were referred for colposcopy if they presented with abnormal cytology and/or a positive hrHPV test. The hrHPV-positive women with borderline or mild dyskaryosis (BMD) and all women with moderate dyskaryosis or worse (>BMD) were directly referred for colposcopy. Women with BMD and an hrHPV-negative test were advised to repeat cytology at 6 and 18 months and were referred for colposcopy if the repeat cytology test was abnormal. The main outcome measure was CIN grade 3 or worse (CIN3). Results were adjusted for non-attendance at repeat testing.Results:The hrHPV-positive women with abnormal cytology had a CIN3 risk of 42.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 36.4-48.2), whereas the hrHPV-positive women with normal cytology had a much lower risk of 5.22% (95% CI: 3.72-7.91). In hrHPV-positive women with normal cytology, an additional cytology step after 1 year reduced the CIN3 risk to only 1.6% (95% CI: 0.6-4.9) if the repeat test was normal. The CIN3 risk in women with hrHPV-positive normal cytology was higher among women invited for the first time (29-33 years of age) (9.1%; 95% CI: 5.6-14.3) than among older women (3.0%; 95% CI: 1.5-5.5).Conclusion:Primary hrHPV screening with cytology triage in women aged ≥30 years is an effective way to stratify women on CIN3 risk and seems a feasible alternative to cytological screening. Repeat cytology after 1 year for hrHPV-positive women with normal cytology is however necessary before returning women to routine screening.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 975-981 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | British Journal of Cancer |
| Volume | 106 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 28 Feb 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The study was supported by the Stichting Researchfonds Pathologie Amsterdam and Saltro Laboratory Utrecht. We thank all the staff of the Saltro Laboratory Utrecht for their expertise, commitment, and invaluable support for the VUSA-Screen study. We thank participating GPs, their assistants, the gynaecologists and the thousands of women who have participated in this study. Qiagen (Digene) is acknowledged for providing collection tubes with UCM and HC2 kits.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'HPV DNA testing in population-based cervical screening (VUSA-Screen study): Results and implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver