TY - JOUR
T1 - Imaging response evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment in soft tissue sarcomas
T2 - Where do we stand?
AU - Gennaro, Nicolò
AU - Reijers, Sophie
AU - Bruining, Annemarie
AU - Messiou, Christina
AU - Haas, Rick
AU - Colombo, Piergiuseppe
AU - Bodalal, Zuhir
AU - Beets-Tan, Regina
AU - van Houdt, Winan
AU - van der Graaf, Winette T.A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a broad family of rare tumours for which surgery with radiotherapy represents first-line treatment. Recently, neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy has been increasingly used in high-risk patients in an effort to reduce surgical morbidity and improve clinical outcomes. An adequate understanding of the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapies would optimise patient care, allowing a tailored approach. Although response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) is the most common imaging method to assess tumour response, Choi criteria and functional and molecular imaging (DWI, DCE-MRI and 18F-FDG-PET) seem to outperform it in the discrimination between responders and non-responders. Moreover, the radiologic-pathology correlation of treatment-related changes remains poorly understood. In this review, we provide an overview of the imaging assessment of tumour response in STS undergoing neoadjuvant treatment, including conventional imaging (CT, MRI, PET) and advanced imaging analysis. Future directions will be presented to shed light on potential advances in pre-surgical imaging assessments that have clinical implications for sarcoma patients.
AB - Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a broad family of rare tumours for which surgery with radiotherapy represents first-line treatment. Recently, neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy has been increasingly used in high-risk patients in an effort to reduce surgical morbidity and improve clinical outcomes. An adequate understanding of the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapies would optimise patient care, allowing a tailored approach. Although response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) is the most common imaging method to assess tumour response, Choi criteria and functional and molecular imaging (DWI, DCE-MRI and 18F-FDG-PET) seem to outperform it in the discrimination between responders and non-responders. Moreover, the radiologic-pathology correlation of treatment-related changes remains poorly understood. In this review, we provide an overview of the imaging assessment of tumour response in STS undergoing neoadjuvant treatment, including conventional imaging (CT, MRI, PET) and advanced imaging analysis. Future directions will be presented to shed light on potential advances in pre-surgical imaging assessments that have clinical implications for sarcoma patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103035358&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103309
DO - 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103309
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33757836
AN - SCOPUS:85103035358
SN - 1040-8428
VL - 160
JO - Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
JF - Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
M1 - 103309
ER -