Impact of centralization of pancreatic cancer surgery on resection rates and survival

GA Gooiker, Valery Lemmens, MG Besselink, OR Busch, BA Bonsing, IQ Molenaar, RAEM Tollenaar, IHJT de Hingh, MWJM (Michel) Wouters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

225 Citations (Scopus)


Background: Centralization of pancreatic surgery has been shown to reduce postoperative mortality. It is unknown whether resection rates and survival have also improved. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of nationwide centralization of pancreatic surgery on resection rates and long-term survival. Methods: All patients diagnosed in the Netherlands between 2000 and 2009 with cancer of the pancreatic head were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Changes in referral pattern, resection rates and survival after pancreatoduodenectomy were analysed. Multivariable regression analysis was used to assess the impact of hospital volume (20 or more procedures per year) on survival after resection. Results: Between 2000 and 2009, 11 160 patients were diagnosed with cancer of the pancreatic head. The resection rate increased from 10.7 per cent in 2000-2004 to 15.3 per cent in 2005-2009 (P < 0.001). No significant difference in survival after resection was observed between the two intervals (P = 0.135), although survival was significantly better in high-volume hospitals (median survival 18 months versus 16 months in low/medium-volume hospitals; P = 0.017). After adjustment for patient and tumour characteristics, high hospital volume remained associated with better overall survival after resection (hazard ratio 0.70, 95 per cent confidence interval 0.58 to 0.84; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Centralization of pancreatic cancer surgery led to increased resection rates. High-volume centres had significantly better survival rates. Centralization improves patient outcomes and should be encouraged.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)1000-1005
Number of pages6
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Research programs

  • EMC NIHES-02-65-02

Cite this