Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of Coronary CT Angiography–derived Fractional Flow Reserve on Downstream Management and Clinical Outcomes in Individuals with and without Diabetes

  • Gaurav S. Gulsin*
  • , Georgios Tzimas
  • , Kenneth Royce Holmes
  • , Hidenobu Takagi
  • , Stephanie L. Sellers
  • , Philipp Blanke
  • , Lynne M.H. Koweek
  • , Bjarne L. Nørgaard
  • , Jesper Jensen
  • , Mark G. Rabbat
  • , Gianluca Pontone
  • , Timothy A. Fairbairn
  • , Kavitha M. Chinnaiyan
  • , Pamela S. Douglas
  • , Whitney Huey
  • , Hitoshi Matsuo
  • , Niels P.R. Sand
  • , Koen Nieman
  • , Jeroen J. Bax
  • , Tetsuya Amano
  • Tomohiro Kawasaki, Takashi Akasaka, Campbell Rogers, Daniel S. Berman, Manesh R. Patel, Bernard De Bruyne, Sarah Mullen, Jonathon A. Leipsic
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of British Columbia
  • University of Leicester
  • University Hospital Lausanne
  • Duke University
  • Aarhus University Hospital
  • Loyola University Chicago
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
  • IRCCS Centro Cardiologico S.P.A. Fondazione Monzino - Milano
  • University of Liverpool
  • Beaumont Health
  • Heartflow Inc.
  • Gifu Heart Center
  • University of Southern Denmark
  • Leiden University Medical Centre
  • Aichi Medical University
  • Shin Koga Hospital
  • Wakayama Medical University
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • Cardiovascular Center Aalst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the clinical use of coronary CT angiography (CCTA)–derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) in individuals with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). Materials and Methods: This secondary analysis included participants (enrolled July 2015 to October 2017) from the prospective, multicenter, international The Assessing Diagnostic Value of Noninvasive CT-FFR in Coronary Care (ADVANCE) registry (ClinicalTrials. gov identifier, NCT 02499679) who were evaluated for suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), with one or more coronary stenosis ≥30% on CCTA images, using CT-FFR. CCTA and CT-FFR findings, treatment strategies at 90 days, and clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up were compared in participants with and without DM. Results: The study included 4290 participants (mean age, 66 years ± 10 [SD]; 66% male participants; 22% participants with DM). Participants with DM had more obstructive CAD (one or more coronary stenosis ≥50%; 78.8% vs 70.6%, P < .001), multivessel CAD (three-vessel obstructive CAD; 18.9% vs 11.2%, P < .001), and proportionally more vessels with CT-FFR ≤ 0.8 (74.3% vs 64.6%, P < .001). Treatment reclassification by CT-FFR occurred in two-thirds of participants which was consistent regardless of the presence of DM. There was a similar graded increase in coronary revascularization with declining CT-FFR in both groups. At 1 year, presence of DM was associated with higher rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% CI: 1.2, 4.1; P = .01). However, no between group differences were observed when stratified by stenosis severity (<50% or ≥50%) or CT-FFR positivity. Conclusion: Both anatomic CCTA findings and CT-FFR demonstrated a more complex pattern of CAD in participants with versus without DM. Rates of treatment reclassification were similar regardless of the presence of DM, and DM was not an adverse prognostic indicator when adjusted for diameter stenosis and CT-FFR.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere220276
JournalRadiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging
Volume5
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © RSNA, 2023.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of Coronary CT Angiography–derived Fractional Flow Reserve on Downstream Management and Clinical Outcomes in Individuals with and without Diabetes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this