Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical care in the Netherlands

Michelle R. de Graaff, Rianne N. M. Hogenbirk, Dutch CovidSurg Collaborative Study Group, Yester F. Janssen, Arthur K. E. Elfrink, Ronald S. L. Liem, Simon W. Nienhuijs, Jean-Paul P. M. de Vries, Jan-Willem Elshof, Emiel Verdaasdonk, Jarno Melenhorst, H. L. van Westreenen, Marc G. H. Besselink, Jelle P. Ruurda, Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, Joost M. Klaase, Marcel den Dulk, Mark van Heijl, Johannes H. Hegeman, Jerry BraunDaan M. Voeten, Franka S. Wurdemann, Anne-Loes K. Warps, Anna J. Alberga, J. Annelie Suurmeijer, Erman O. Akpinar, Nienke Wolfhagen, Anne Loes van den Boom, Marieke J. Bolster-van Eenennaam, Peter van Duijvendijk, David J. Heineman, Michel W. J. M. Wouters, Schelto Kruijff*, R.B. Waalboer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
106 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused disruption of regular healthcare leading to reduced hospital attendances, repurposing of surgical facilities, and cancellation of cancer screening programmes. This study aimed to determine the impact of COVID-19 on surgical care in the Netherlands. METHODS: A nationwide study was conducted in collaboration with the Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing. Eight surgical audits were expanded with items regarding alterations in scheduling and treatment plans. Data on procedures performed in 2020 were compared with those from a historical cohort (2018-2019). Endpoints included total numbers of procedures performed and altered treatment plans. Secondary endpoints included complication, readmission, and mortality rates. RESULTS: Some 12 154 procedures were performed in participating hospitals in 2020, representing a decrease of 13.6 per cent compared with 2018-2019. The largest reduction (29.2 per cent) was for non-cancer procedures during the first COVID-19 wave. Surgical treatment was postponed for 9.6 per cent of patients. Alterations in surgical treatment plans were observed in 1.7 per cent. Time from diagnosis to surgery decreased (to 28 days in 2020, from 34 days in 2019 and 36 days in 2018; P < 0.001). For cancer-related procedures, duration of hospital stay decreased (5 versus 6 days; P < 0.001). Audit-specific complications, readmission, and mortality rates were unchanged, but ICU admissions decreased (16.5 versus 16.8 per cent; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The reduction in the number of surgical operations was greatest for those without cancer. Where surgery was undertaken, it appeared to be delivered safely, with similar complication and mortality rates, fewer admissions to ICU, and a shorter hospital stay.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1282-1292
Number of pages11
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume109
Issue number12
Early online date6 Sept 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2022

Bibliographical note

Acknowledgements: M.R.d.G., R.N.M.H., and Y.F.J. are joint first authors, and contributed equally to this work. The authors thank all the participating members of the Dutch COVIDSurg II Collaborative Study group for their contributions; DICA and Medical Research Data Management for allowing access to their web-based data collection tool, certified on privacy regulations, to analyse the anonymized data; and A. Sieben for editing the visuals presented in Fig. 1. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05126498) without an analysis plan.

Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical care in the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this