Impact on estrogen receptor binding and target tissue uptake of [ 18F]fluorine substitution at the 16α-position of fulvestrant (Faslodex; ICI 182,780)

Yann Seimbille, François Bénard*, Jacques Rousseau, Emilie Pepin, Antonio Aliaga, Guillaume Tessier, Johan E. Van Lier

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fulvestrant (Faslodex; ICI 182,780) is a pure estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist recently approved for the treatment of hormone-sensitive breast cancer in post-menopausal women with disease progression following antiestrogen therapy. Fulvestrant strongly binds to the ER and its mode of action consists of inhibition of ER dimerization leading to a down regulation of ER protein cellular levels. With the aim to develop a probe for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging capable of predicting the potential therapeutic efficacy of selective ER modulators (SERM), we prepared three new 16α-[18F]fluoro-fulvestrant derivatives. These new radiopharmaceuticals were evaluated for their binding affinity to the human ERα and for their target tissue uptake in immature female rats. Substitution of one of the side-chain F-atoms of fulvestrant for 18F would have led to a product of low specific activity; instead we selected the 16α-position for 18F-labeling, which at least in the case of estradiol (ES) is well tolerated by the ER. Radiochemical synthesis proceeds by stereoselective introduction of the [18F]fluoride at the 16- 18F-position of fulvestrant via opening of an intermediate O-cyclic sulfate followed by hydrolysis of the protecting methoxymethyl (MOM) ether and sulfate groups. Three analogs with different oxidation states of the side chain sulfur, i.e. sulfide, sulfone or sulfoxide (fulvestrant) were prepared. Introduction of the 1618F-fluorine led to a dramatic decrease of the apparent binding affinity for ER, as reported by Wakeling et al. (Cancer Res. 1991;51:3867-73). Likewise, in vivo ER-mediated uterus uptake values in immature female rats were disappointing. Overall, our findings suggest that these new PET radiopharmaceuticals are not suitable as tracers to predict ER(+) breast cancer response to hormonal therapy with selective ER modulators.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)691-698
Number of pages8
JournalNuclear Medicine and Biology
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2004
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Grant No. MOP-44065 and the Canadian Breast Cancer Research Initiative (CBCRI) Grant No. 012301. FB is supported by CIHR under the clinician-scientist program and JEvL is the holder of the Jeanne and J.-Louis Lévesque Chair in Radiobiology.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact on estrogen receptor binding and target tissue uptake of [ 18F]fluorine substitution at the 16α-position of fulvestrant (Faslodex; ICI 182,780)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this