In Patients with ARDS, Optimal PEEP Should Not Be Determined Using the Intersection of Relative Collapse and Relative Overdistention Reply

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1189-1190
Number of pages	2
Journal	American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Volume	202
Issue number	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1164%2Frccm.202006-2175LE
Publication status	Published - 2020

Access to Document

@article{e59fdcc1d13640d6b669f671e405f87d,

title = "In Patients with ARDS, Optimal PEEP Should Not Be Determined Using the Intersection of Relative Collapse and Relative Overdistention Reply",

author = "{van der Zee}, Philip and Peter Somhorst and Rik Endeman and Diederik Gommers",

year = "2020",

doi = "10.1164%2Frccm.202006-2175LE",

language = "English",

volume = "202",

pages = "1189--1190",

journal = "American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine",

issn = "1073-449X",

publisher = "American Thoracic Society",

number = "8",

}

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - In Patients with ARDS, Optimal PEEP Should Not Be Determined Using the Intersection of Relative Collapse and Relative Overdistention Reply

AU - van der Zee, Philip

AU - Somhorst, Peter

AU - Endeman, Rik

AU - Gommers, Diederik

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

U2 - 10.1164%2Frccm.202006-2175LE

DO - 10.1164%2Frccm.202006-2175LE

M3 - Article

SN - 1073-449X

VL - 202

SP - 1189

EP - 1190

JO - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

JF - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

IS - 8

ER -