TY - JOUR
T1 - Indicators of safety compromise in gastrointestinal endoscopy
AU - Borgaonkar, MR
AU - Hookey, L
AU - Hollingworth, R
AU - Kuipers, Ernst
AU - Forster, A
AU - Armstrong, D
AU - Barkun, A
AU - Bridges, R
AU - Carter, R
AU - de Gara, C
AU - Dube, C
AU - Enns, R
AU - MacIntosh, D
AU - Forget, S
AU - Leontiadis, G
AU - Meddings, J
AU - Cotton, P
AU - Valori, R
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - MR Borgaonkar, L Hookey, R Hollingworth, et al. Indicators of safety compromise in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol 2012;26(2):71-78. INTRODUCTION: The importance of quality indicators has become increasingly recognized in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patient safety requires the identification and monitoring of occurrences associated with harm or the potential for harm. The identification of relevant indicators of safety compromise is, therefore, a critical element that is key to the effective implementation of endoscopy quality improvement programs. OBJECTIVE: To identify key indicators of safety compromise in gastrointestinal endoscopy. METHODS: The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Safety and Quality Indicators in Endoscopy Consensus Group was formed to address issues of quality in endoscopy. A subcommittee was formed to identify key safety indicators. A systematic literature review was undertaken, and articles pertinent to safety in endoscopy were identified and reviewed. All complications and measures used to document safety were recorded. From this, a preliminary list of 16 indicators was compiled and presented to th RESULTS: A total of 19 indicators of safety compromise were retained and grouped into the three following categories: medication-related the need for CPR, use of reversal agents, hypoxia, hypotension, hypertension, sedation doses in patients older than 70 years of age, allergic reactions and laryngospasm/bronchospasm; procedure-related early - perforation, immediate postpolypectomy bleeding, need for hospital admission or transfer to emergency department from the gastroenterology unit, instrumen CONCLUSIONS: The 19 indicators of safety compromise in endoscopy, identified by a rigorous, evidence-based consensus process, provide clear outcomes to be recorded by all facilities as part of their continuing quality improvement programs.
AB - MR Borgaonkar, L Hookey, R Hollingworth, et al. Indicators of safety compromise in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol 2012;26(2):71-78. INTRODUCTION: The importance of quality indicators has become increasingly recognized in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patient safety requires the identification and monitoring of occurrences associated with harm or the potential for harm. The identification of relevant indicators of safety compromise is, therefore, a critical element that is key to the effective implementation of endoscopy quality improvement programs. OBJECTIVE: To identify key indicators of safety compromise in gastrointestinal endoscopy. METHODS: The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Safety and Quality Indicators in Endoscopy Consensus Group was formed to address issues of quality in endoscopy. A subcommittee was formed to identify key safety indicators. A systematic literature review was undertaken, and articles pertinent to safety in endoscopy were identified and reviewed. All complications and measures used to document safety were recorded. From this, a preliminary list of 16 indicators was compiled and presented to th RESULTS: A total of 19 indicators of safety compromise were retained and grouped into the three following categories: medication-related the need for CPR, use of reversal agents, hypoxia, hypotension, hypertension, sedation doses in patients older than 70 years of age, allergic reactions and laryngospasm/bronchospasm; procedure-related early - perforation, immediate postpolypectomy bleeding, need for hospital admission or transfer to emergency department from the gastroenterology unit, instrumen CONCLUSIONS: The 19 indicators of safety compromise in endoscopy, identified by a rigorous, evidence-based consensus process, provide clear outcomes to be recorded by all facilities as part of their continuing quality improvement programs.
M3 - Article
SN - 0835-7900
VL - 26
SP - 71
EP - 78
JO - Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
JF - Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
IS - 2
ER -