Indicators of safety compromise in gastrointestinal endoscopy

MR Borgaonkar, L Hookey, R Hollingworth, Ernst Kuipers, A Forster, D Armstrong, A Barkun, R Bridges, R Carter, C de Gara, C Dube, R Enns, D MacIntosh, S Forget, G Leontiadis, J Meddings, P Cotton, R Valori

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

MR Borgaonkar, L Hookey, R Hollingworth, et al. Indicators of safety compromise in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol 2012;26(2):71-78. INTRODUCTION: The importance of quality indicators has become increasingly recognized in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patient safety requires the identification and monitoring of occurrences associated with harm or the potential for harm. The identification of relevant indicators of safety compromise is, therefore, a critical element that is key to the effective implementation of endoscopy quality improvement programs. OBJECTIVE: To identify key indicators of safety compromise in gastrointestinal endoscopy. METHODS: The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Safety and Quality Indicators in Endoscopy Consensus Group was formed to address issues of quality in endoscopy. A subcommittee was formed to identify key safety indicators. A systematic literature review was undertaken, and articles pertinent to safety in endoscopy were identified and reviewed. All complications and measures used to document safety were recorded. From this, a preliminary list of 16 indicators was compiled and presented to th RESULTS: A total of 19 indicators of safety compromise were retained and grouped into the three following categories: medication-related the need for CPR, use of reversal agents, hypoxia, hypotension, hypertension, sedation doses in patients older than 70 years of age, allergic reactions and laryngospasm/bronchospasm; procedure-related early - perforation, immediate postpolypectomy bleeding, need for hospital admission or transfer to emergency department from the gastroenterology unit, instrumen CONCLUSIONS: The 19 indicators of safety compromise in endoscopy, identified by a rigorous, evidence-based consensus process, provide clear outcomes to be recorded by all facilities as part of their continuing quality improvement programs.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)71-78
Number of pages8
JournalCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume26
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Research programs

  • EMC MM-04-20-01

Cite this