Innovation across cultures: Connecting leadership, identification, and creative behavior in organizations

  • Eva M. Bracht
  • , Lucas Monzani
  • , Diana Boer
  • , S. Alexander Haslam
  • , Rudolf Kerschreiter
  • , Jérémy E. Lemoine
  • , Niklas K. Steffens
  • , Serap Arslan Akfirat
  • , Lorenzo Avanzi
  • , Bita Barghi
  • , Kitty Dumont
  • , Charlotte M. Edelmann
  • , Olga Epitropaki
  • , Katrien Fransen
  • , Steffen Giessner
  • , Ilka H. Gleibs
  • , Roberto González
  • , Ana Laguía González
  • , Jukka Lipponen
  • , Yannis Markovits
  • Fernando Molero, Juan A. Moriano, Pedro Neves, Gábor Orosz, Christine Roland-Lévy, Sebastian C. Schuh, Tomoki Sekiguchi, Lynda Jiwen Song, Joana S.P. Story, Jeroen Stouten, Srinivasan Tatachari, Daniel Valdenegro, Lisanne van Bunderen, Viktor Vörös, Sut I. Wong, Farida Youssef, Xin an Zhang, Rolf van Dick*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Innovation is considered essential for today's organizations to survive and thrive. Researchers have also stressed the importance of leadership as a driver of followers' innovative work behavior (FIB). Yet, despite a large amount of research, three areas remain understudied: (a) The relative importance of different forms of leadership for FIB; (b) the mechanisms through which leadership impacts FIB; and (c) the degree to which relationships between leadership and FIB are generalizable across cultures. To address these lacunae, we propose an integrated model connecting four types of positive leadership behaviors, two types of identification (as mediating variables), and FIB. We tested our model in a global data set comprising responses of N = 7,225 participants from 23 countries, grouped into nine cultural clusters. Our results indicate that perceived LMX quality was the strongest relative predictor of FIB. Furthermore, the relationships between both perceived LMX quality and identity leadership with FIB were mediated by social identification. The indirect effect of LMX on FIB via social identification was stable across clusters, whereas the indirect effects of the other forms of leadership on FIB via social identification were stronger in countries high versus low on collectivism. Power distance did not influence the relations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)348-388
Number of pages41
JournalApplied Psychology
Volume72
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We are grateful to Kim von der Wehl, Christopher Lark, Charlotte Rabener, Leon Hoche, and Berrit Cordes for their help in setting up and monitoring the online surveys and Julia Heimrich for her support with data checks. Roberto González was supported by the Interdisciplinary Center for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies (COES) (ANID/FONDAP #15130009) and the Center for Intercultural and Indigenous Research (CIIR) (ANID/FONDAP #15110006) and Fondecyt (1161371). Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Funding Information:
We are grateful to Kim von der Wehl, Christopher Lark, Charlotte Rabener, Leon Hoche, and Berrit Cordes for their help in setting up and monitoring the online surveys and Julia Heimrich for her support with data checks. Roberto González was supported by the Interdisciplinary Center for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies (COES) (ANID/FONDAP #15130009) and the Center for Intercultural and Indigenous Research (CIIR) (ANID/FONDAP #15110006) and Fondecyt (1161371). Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Applied Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Association of Applied Psychology.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Innovation across cultures: Connecting leadership, identification, and creative behavior in organizations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this