@inbook{4739e6dc9586482cae1cd8f2a015db8b,
title = "Institutional Constraints of Topical Strategic Maneuvering in Legal Argumentation. The Case of {\textquoteleft}Insulting{\textquoteright} .",
abstract = "Strategic maneuvering refers to the efforts parties make to reconcile rhetorical effectiveness with dialectical standards of reasonableness. It manifests itself in topical selection, audience-directed framing and presentational devices. In analyzing strategic maneuvering one category of parameters to be considered are the constraints of the institutional context. In this paper I explore the institutional constraints for topical selection for the legal argumentative activity type insulting. I will make a distinction between statutory constraints, constraints developed in case law and constraints regarding language use and the logic of conversational implicatures",
author = "Harm Kloosterhuis",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319161471",
series = "Law and Philosophy Library",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag",
pages = "67--75",
editor = "Thomas Bustamante and Christian Dahlman",
booktitle = "Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation",
address = "Germany",
}