TY - JOUR
T1 - Institutions and Pastoralist Conflicts in Africa: A Conceptual Framework
AU - Penu, Dennis
AU - Paalo, A S
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article: The fieldwork to collect data on the Agogo case was partly sponsored by the Patrick Duncan graduate research fund at the University of Oxford.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
PY - 2021/3/3
Y1 - 2021/3/3
N2 - Pastoralist conflicts are important global development outcomes, especially in Africa. Analysing relevant literature on this phenomenon, we identify “institutions” as a key but fragmented theme. This blurs a composite understanding of how institutions affect these conflicts and their management. Hence, this article proposes a conceptual framework that brings harmony to this discourse by analysing 172 relevant publications. The framework was then tested using evidence from interviews and policy documents collected on a typical case in Agogo, Ghana. The findings show that pastoralist conflicts in Africa are shaped from three main dimensions: institutional change, institutional pluralism, and institutional meanings. Thus, state-level institutional changes create different institutions at the community level, and stakeholders using these institutions place different evaluations on them based on obtained outcomes. These dynamics contribute to conflict management dilemmas. Hence, the study recommends that intervention efforts examine whether new institutions contradict existing ones and to resolve them before implementation.
AB - Pastoralist conflicts are important global development outcomes, especially in Africa. Analysing relevant literature on this phenomenon, we identify “institutions” as a key but fragmented theme. This blurs a composite understanding of how institutions affect these conflicts and their management. Hence, this article proposes a conceptual framework that brings harmony to this discourse by analysing 172 relevant publications. The framework was then tested using evidence from interviews and policy documents collected on a typical case in Agogo, Ghana. The findings show that pastoralist conflicts in Africa are shaped from three main dimensions: institutional change, institutional pluralism, and institutional meanings. Thus, state-level institutional changes create different institutions at the community level, and stakeholders using these institutions place different evaluations on them based on obtained outcomes. These dynamics contribute to conflict management dilemmas. Hence, the study recommends that intervention efforts examine whether new institutions contradict existing ones and to resolve them before implementation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102133607&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1542316621995733
DO - 10.1177/1542316621995733
M3 - Article
VL - 16
SP - 224
EP - 241
JO - Journal of Peacebuilding and Development
JF - Journal of Peacebuilding and Development
SN - 1542-3166
IS - 2
ER -