TY - JOUR
T1 - Interchangeability of immune checkpoint inhibitors
T2 - an urgent need for action
AU - Zietse, Michiel
AU - van Leeuwen, Roelof W.F.
AU - Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani, Sahar
AU - de Boer, Jolanda E.
AU - Dupree, Rudy
AU - Mathijssen, Ron H.J.
AU - Timmers, Lonneke
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - Prevailing uncertainties regarding the therapeutic interchangeability of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors affect both clinical decision making and health-care budgeting. This Personal View presents a comprehensive assessment of the fragmented regulatory landscape of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, highlighting the complex dynamics of market competition, pricing, and the effect on health-care budgets. Our paper explores the current state of clinical trials, uninformative trial designs, and the challenges they pose in evaluating the therapeutic interchangeability of these drugs. To address these challenges, research that will inform us of the extent of interchangeability of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors is needed. We recommend head-to-head randomised controlled trials, standardised study designs for indirect comparisons, trials with monotherapy groups, post-approval trials funded from private or public sources, and adoption of a near-equivalence framework in both conducting and evaluating trials.
AB - Prevailing uncertainties regarding the therapeutic interchangeability of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors affect both clinical decision making and health-care budgeting. This Personal View presents a comprehensive assessment of the fragmented regulatory landscape of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, highlighting the complex dynamics of market competition, pricing, and the effect on health-care budgets. Our paper explores the current state of clinical trials, uninformative trial designs, and the challenges they pose in evaluating the therapeutic interchangeability of these drugs. To address these challenges, research that will inform us of the extent of interchangeability of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors is needed. We recommend head-to-head randomised controlled trials, standardised study designs for indirect comparisons, trials with monotherapy groups, post-approval trials funded from private or public sources, and adoption of a near-equivalence framework in both conducting and evaluating trials.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85207228127&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00212-2
DO - 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00212-2
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39419062
AN - SCOPUS:85207228127
SN - 1470-2045
VL - 25
SP - e611-e616
JO - The Lancet Oncology
JF - The Lancet Oncology
IS - 11
ER -