Interleukin 2 (IL-2) therapy: Potential advantages of locoregional versus systemic administration

Monique R. Bernsen, Jian Wu Tang, Linda A. Everse, Jan Willem Koten, Willem Den Otter*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There has been an apparent discrepancy between the results obtained with IL-2 based immunotherapy in animal tumour models, including veterinary cancer patients, and human cancer patients. We argue that this is due to differences in the therapeutic regimens used to treat human and veterinary cancer patients. The main differences are systemic therapy and surgical removal of the primary tumour in case of human cancer patients, whereas these treatment modalities are not used in IL-2 treated veterinary cancer cases. We have developed a treatment protocol, in which IL-2 is applied locally that has been successful against transplanted tumours as well as spontaneous tumours of varying origin and immunogenicity. In view of immunobiological considerations we conclude that local treatment of cancer with IL-2 makes more sense than systemic treatment, as usually applied in the clinic, and that surgical removal of tumours may be detrimental to successful IL-2 therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-82
Number of pages10
JournalCancer Treatment Reviews
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interleukin 2 (IL-2) therapy: Potential advantages of locoregional versus systemic administration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this