Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Intra- and post-procedural patient-reported experience measures and their correlation with post-ERCP adverse events and unplanned healthcare utilization

  • Alessandra Ceccacci
  • , Mehul Gupta
  • , Maximilian Eisele
  • , The CReATE Working Group
  • , Rishad Khan
  • , Jonathan Besney
  • , Howard Guo
  • , Getanshu Malik
  • , Catherine Tsai
  • , Arjun Kundra
  • , Sunil Samnani
  • , Angelica Rivas
  • , Gurjot Minhas
  • , Alejandra Tepox-Padrón
  • , Yousef Alshammari
  • , Millie Chau
  • , Megan Howarth
  • , Shane Cartwright
  • , Sara Ficcacio
  • , Hannah F. Koury
  • Enrique De-Madaria, Nauzer Forbes*, Yen I. Chen, Andrew Singh, Lawrence Hookey, Naveen Arya, Natalia Causada Calo, Samir C. Grover, Peter D. Siersema, Avi Chatterjee, Nirav Thosani, Steven J. Heitman, Yang Lei, Suqing Li, Zhao Wu Meng, Rachid Mohamed, Christian Turbide
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Toronto
  • Cumming School of Medicine
  • University of Calgary
  • University of Virginia
  • McMaster University
  • Dr. Balmis General University Hospital
  • McGill University
  • University of British Columbia
  • Queen's University Kingston
  • Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital
  • Scarborough Health Network
  • University of Ottawa
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
94 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) adverse events (AEs) are common, as is unplanned healthcare utilization (UHU). We aimed to assess potential etiologic associations between intra-/post-procedural patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) and post-ERCP AEs and UHU. 

Methods Prospective data from a multicenter collaborative were used. A 0-10 Likert-based PREM assessing intra-and post-procedural symptoms was applied to patients following ERCP, and follow-up was performed at 30 days to identify AEs and UHU for reasons not meeting the definitions of any AE. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted using PREM domains as exposures and AEs and UHU as outcomes, with a priori selected covariates. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95%CIs for each PREM domain were reported. Results From 2018 to 2023, 3434 patients were included. A post-procedural abdominal pain score >3 was associated with pancreatitis (OR 3.71 [95%CI 2.37-5.73]), while a score >6 was associated with perforation (OR 9.54 [95%CI 1.10-59.37]). Post-procedural pain was also associated with UHU within 30 days when used as a continuous exposure (OR 1.08 per point [95%CI 1.01-1.16]), and when partitioned at a score >3 (OR 1.79 [95%CI 1.13-2.74]) and a score >6 (OR 1.93 [95%CI 1.02-3.46]). No other intra- or post-procedural PREMs were associated with any AEs or UHU. Conclusions Patient-reported abdominal pain from a Likert-based PREM at the time of discharge from ERCP was associated with pancreatitis, perforation, and UHU within 30 days. Applying PREMs could potentially prevent UHU and/or facilitate earlier management and improved outcomes for patients with post-ERCP AEs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)220-227
Number of pages8
JournalEndoscopy
Volume57
Issue number3
Early online date19 Sept 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Nov 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Thieme. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intra- and post-procedural patient-reported experience measures and their correlation with post-ERCP adverse events and unplanned healthcare utilization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this