Is Early Active Motion After 3-Ligament Tenodesis Noninferior to Late Active Motion? A Prospective, Multicenter Cohort Study

Daniel Bakker*, J. W. Colaris, Hand-Wrist Study Group, Gerald A. Kraan, Nina Mathijssen, R. W. Selles, Xander Smit, Robbert Wouters

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: If early active motion after 3-ligament tenodesis is safe, it may yield more patient comfort and an early return to activities. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether early active motion is noninferior to late active motion after 3-ligament tenodesis for scapholunate interosseous ligament injuries. Methods: This prospective, multicenter cohort study, using a noninferiority design with propensity score matching, compared a late active motion protocol (immobilization for 10–16 days, wrist therapy in weeks 5–6) with an early active motion protocol (immobilization for 3–5 days, wrist therapy during week 2). Patients who were older than 18 years, had complete baseline information on demographics, and underwent 3-ligament tenodesis were included. The outcome measures were postoperative Patient-Reported Wrist/Hand Evaluation scores, pain, complications, return to work, range of motion, grip strength, and satisfaction with treatment results at 3 months of follow-up. Results: After propensity matching, a total of 108 patients were included. Patient-Reported Wrist/Hand Evaluation and pain scores during physical load following an early active motion protocol were noninferior compared with scores following a late active motion protocol. Furthermore, early active motion did not lead to an increase of complications, differences in range of motion or grip strength, or less satisfaction with the treatment result. An earlier return to work was not observed. Conclusions: Early active motion leads to noninferior results without more complications as compared with late active motion. Based on these findings, early active motion can be considered safe, and might be recommended due to its potential benefits compared with late active motion after 3-ligament tenodesis. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic III.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1076-1084
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Hand Surgery
Volume47
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is Early Active Motion After 3-Ligament Tenodesis Noninferior to Late Active Motion? A Prospective, Multicenter Cohort Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this