Abstract
The theory about missing links of economic growth often lags behind the empirical estimations of such links. A consensus has emerged that ethnic fractionalization has a negative impact on growth, also when controlled for income inequality. Often, although implicitly, the assumed channel is social cohesion. We analyse the effect of fractionalization on social cohesion with a different inequality measure, namely a social measure of inequality: the Inclusion of Minorities Index. Our results indicate that it is social exclusion, which reduces social cohesion, rather than diversity as such. We conclude that future studies of social cohesion and its relation to growth may benefit from using measures of social exclusion next to ethnic diversity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Social Indicators Research |
| Volume | 130 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 19 Dec 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Research programs
- EUR-ISS-CIRI
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Is It Ethnic Fractionalization or Social Exclusion, which affects Social Cohesion?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver