Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Is Metabolic Syndrome Predictive of Prevalence, Extent, and Risk of Coronary Artery Disease beyond Its Components? Results from the Multinational Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcome: An International Multicenter Registry (CONFIRM)

  • A Ahmadi
  • , J Leipsic
  • , G Feuchtner
  • , H Gransar
  • , D Kalra
  • , R Heo
  • , S Achenbach
  • , D Andreini
  • , M Al-Mallah
  • , DS Berman
  • , M Budoff
  • , F. Cademartiri
  • , TQ Callister
  • , HJ Chang
  • , K Chinnaiyan
  • , B Chow
  • , RC Cury
  • , A Delago
  • , MJ Gomez
  • , M Hadamitzky
  • J Hausleiter, N Hindoyan, PA Kaufmann, YJ Kim, F Lin, E Maffei, G Pontone, GL Raff, LJ Shaw, TC Villines, A Dunning, JK Min

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)
24 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Although metabolic syndrome is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and events, its added prognostic value beyond its components remains unknown. This study compared the prevalence, severity of coronary artery disease (CAD), and prognosis of patients with metabolic syndrome to those with individual metabolic syndrome components. The study cohort consisted of 27125 consecutive individuals who underwent >= 64-detector row coronary CT angiography (CCTA) at 12 centers from 2003 to 2009. Metabolic syndrome was defined as per NCEP/ATP III criteria. Metabolic syndrome patients (n=690) were matched 1:1:1 to those with 1 component (n=690) and 2 components (n=690) of metabolic syndrome for age, sex, smoking status, and family history of premature CAD using propensity scoring. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined by a composite of myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndrome, mortality and late target vessel revascularization. Patients with 1 component of metabolic syndrome manifested lower rates of obstructive 1-, 2-, and 3-vessel/left main disease compared to metabolic syndrome patients (9.4% vs 13.8%, 2.6% vs 4.5%, and 1.0% vs 2.3%, respectively; p<0.05), while those with 2 components did not (10.5% vs 13.8%, 2.8% vs 4.5% and 1.3% vs 2.3%, respectively; p>0.05). At 2.5 years, metabolic syndrome patients experienced a higher rate of MACE compared to patients with 1 component (4.4% vs 1.6%; p=0.002), while no difference observed compared to individuals with 2 components (4.4% vs 3.2% p=0.25) of metabolic syndrome. In conclusion, Metabolic syndrome patients have significantly greater prevalence, severity, and prognosis of CAD compared to patients with 1 but not 2 components of metabolic syndrome.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
JournalPLoS One (print)
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Research programs

  • EMC NIHES-03-30-01

Cite this