Abstract
Although scholars imply that job crafting contributes to person–job fit and meaningful work, to
date, no study examined the relationships between these variables. The present three-wave
weekbook study was designed to gain more knowledge about the influence of job crafting on
person–job fit and meaningfulness. We collected data among a heterogeneous group of employees
(N = 114) during three consecutive weeks (N = 430 occasions). At the end of their working week,
employees reported their job crafting behaviors, their person–job fit (demands–abilities fit and
needs–supplies fit), and the meaningfulness of their work that week. Results indicated that individuals who crafted their job by increasing their job resources (e.g., support, autonomy) and challenging job demands (e.g., participate in new projects), and by decreasing their hindering job demands
(e.g., less emotional job demands) reported higher levels of person–job fit the next week. In turn,
demands–abilities fit related to more meaningfulness in the final week. No support was found
for alternative causal models. These findings suggest that by crafting their job demands and job resources, individuals can proactively optimize their person–job fit and as a consequence experience
their work as meaningful.
date, no study examined the relationships between these variables. The present three-wave
weekbook study was designed to gain more knowledge about the influence of job crafting on
person–job fit and meaningfulness. We collected data among a heterogeneous group of employees
(N = 114) during three consecutive weeks (N = 430 occasions). At the end of their working week,
employees reported their job crafting behaviors, their person–job fit (demands–abilities fit and
needs–supplies fit), and the meaningfulness of their work that week. Results indicated that individuals who crafted their job by increasing their job resources (e.g., support, autonomy) and challenging job demands (e.g., participate in new projects), and by decreasing their hindering job demands
(e.g., less emotional job demands) reported higher levels of person–job fit the next week. In turn,
demands–abilities fit related to more meaningfulness in the final week. No support was found
for alternative causal models. These findings suggest that by crafting their job demands and job resources, individuals can proactively optimize their person–job fit and as a consequence experience
their work as meaningful.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 44-53 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Vocational Behavior |
| Volume | 92 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Research programs
- ESSB PSY
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Job crafting and its relationships with person-job fit and meaningfulness: A three-wave study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver