Keep it green, simple and socially fair: A choice experiment on prosumers’ preferences for peer-to-peer electricity trading in the Netherlands

Elena Georgarakis*, Thomas Bauwens, Anne Marie Pronk, Tarek AlSkaif

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While the potential for peer-to-peer electricity trading, where households trade surplus electricity with peers in a local energy market, is rapidly growing, the drivers of participation in this trading scheme have been understudied so far. In particular, there is a dearth of research on the role of non-monetary incentives for trading surplus electricity, despite their potentially important role. This paper presents the first discrete choice experiment conducted with prosumers (i.e. proactive households actively managing their electricity production and consumption) in the Netherlands. Electricity trading preferences are analyzed regarding economic, environmental, social and technological parameters, based on survey data (N = 74). The dimensions most valued by prosumers are the environmental and, to a lesser extent, economic dimensions, highlighting the key motivating roles of environmental factors. Furthermore, a majority of prosumers stated they would provide surplus electricity for free or for non-monetary compensations, especially to energy-poor households. These observed trends were more pronounced among members of energy cooperatives. This suggests that peer-to-peer energy trading can advance a socially just energy transition. Regarding policy recommendations, these findings point to the need for communicating environmental and economic benefits when marketing P2P electricity trading platforms and for technical designs enabling effortless and customizable transactions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number112615
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume159
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work is part of the research project: “A Blockchain-based platform for peer-to-peer energy transactions between Distributed Energy Resources (B-DER)”, which received funding from the Netherlands Enterprise Agency (RVO) within the Topsector Energy framework, project number: 1621404 . The authors want to thank Dr. Esther Mengelkamp for sharing her expertise on local electricity markets and conducting choice experiments in the early stages of this research. We also want to thank Dr. Hendrik Kondziella of Leipzig University for providing feedback on the first version of this article. Finally, we thank Sawtooth Software Inc. for sponsoring this research with an academic grant to use the software.

Funding Information:
This work is part of the research project: “A Blockchain-based platform for peer-to-peer energy transactions between Distributed Energy Resources (B-DER)”, which received funding from the Netherlands Enterprise Agency (RVO) within the Topsector Energy framework, project number: 1621404. The authors want to thank Dr. Esther Mengelkamp for sharing her expertise on local electricity markets and conducting choice experiments in the early stages of this research. We also want to thank Dr. Hendrik Kondziella of Leipzig University for providing feedback on the first version of this article. Finally, we thank Sawtooth Software Inc. for sponsoring this research with an academic grant to use the software.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Keep it green, simple and socially fair: A choice experiment on prosumers’ preferences for peer-to-peer electricity trading in the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this