TY - JOUR
T1 - Key factors in shared decision making between people with osteoarthritis and physiotherapists
T2 - A narrative study using storytelling
AU - Jager, J.
AU - Rosbergen, I.
AU - van der Sluis, G.
AU - van Meeteren, N. L.U.
AU - Siemonsma, P. C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Authors
PY - 2026/2
Y1 - 2026/2
N2 - Objectives: To improve the quality of shared decision-making (SDM), this study examined factors perceived by people with osteoarthritis (PwOA) and physiotherapists to influence shared decision making (SDM), and how these perceptions align with a widely used SDM model. Methods: Using a qualitative storytelling approach, we collected narratives from 10 PwOA and 7 physiotherapists in the Netherlands. Participants shared personal narratives of lived experiences (“stories”) related to SDM in physiotherapy practice, resulting in 144 unique stories, of which 118 were related to decision-making and included for further analysis. These stories were analyzed through a seven-phase thematic analysis by a multidisciplinary research team (n = 12). Themes were plotted onto the SDM model of Moore and Kaplan. Results: Analysis revealed six main themes: Decision-making as a reciprocal process (four aspects, 51 stories); Influence of patient expectations on decisions (four aspects, 48 stories); Communication and information provision (two aspects, 39 stories); Patients' voice and identity (three aspects, 33 stories); Relationship between patient and healthcare provider (two aspects, 26 stories); External factors influencing decisions (two aspects, 23 stories). Twelve aspects were shared by both PwOA and physiotherapists, one was exclusive to PwOA, and four were unique to physiotherapists. All aspects fit within Moore and Kaplan's SDM model; 12 aligned with specific stages, while five spanned multiple stages. Conclusions: The study unravels the complex nature of SDM in physiotherapy. Storytelling revealed that factors like (power) dynamics as well as the physical environment seem to influence decision-making. Explicitly addressing these dynamics might provide opportunities for strengthening theoretical SDM models, clinical training, and SDM in real-world practice. Practice implications: Greater attention to relational dynamics, patient expectations, and context have the potential to enhance the quality of SDM between PwOA and physiotherapists.
AB - Objectives: To improve the quality of shared decision-making (SDM), this study examined factors perceived by people with osteoarthritis (PwOA) and physiotherapists to influence shared decision making (SDM), and how these perceptions align with a widely used SDM model. Methods: Using a qualitative storytelling approach, we collected narratives from 10 PwOA and 7 physiotherapists in the Netherlands. Participants shared personal narratives of lived experiences (“stories”) related to SDM in physiotherapy practice, resulting in 144 unique stories, of which 118 were related to decision-making and included for further analysis. These stories were analyzed through a seven-phase thematic analysis by a multidisciplinary research team (n = 12). Themes were plotted onto the SDM model of Moore and Kaplan. Results: Analysis revealed six main themes: Decision-making as a reciprocal process (four aspects, 51 stories); Influence of patient expectations on decisions (four aspects, 48 stories); Communication and information provision (two aspects, 39 stories); Patients' voice and identity (three aspects, 33 stories); Relationship between patient and healthcare provider (two aspects, 26 stories); External factors influencing decisions (two aspects, 23 stories). Twelve aspects were shared by both PwOA and physiotherapists, one was exclusive to PwOA, and four were unique to physiotherapists. All aspects fit within Moore and Kaplan's SDM model; 12 aligned with specific stages, while five spanned multiple stages. Conclusions: The study unravels the complex nature of SDM in physiotherapy. Storytelling revealed that factors like (power) dynamics as well as the physical environment seem to influence decision-making. Explicitly addressing these dynamics might provide opportunities for strengthening theoretical SDM models, clinical training, and SDM in real-world practice. Practice implications: Greater attention to relational dynamics, patient expectations, and context have the potential to enhance the quality of SDM between PwOA and physiotherapists.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105022849584
U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2025.109421
DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2025.109421
M3 - Article
C2 - 41308257
AN - SCOPUS:105022849584
SN - 0738-3991
VL - 143
JO - Patient Education and Counseling
JF - Patient Education and Counseling
M1 - 109421
ER -