Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Laparoscopy for colorectal cancer

  • P. J. Tanis*
  • , C. J. Buskens
  • , W. A. Bemelman
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Amsterdam UMC

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlePopular

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The laparoscopic approach for colorectal cancer resection has been evolved from an experimental procedure with oncological concerns to routine daily practice within a period of two decades. Numerous randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have shown that laparoscopic resection results in faster recovery with similar oncological outcome compared to an open approach, both for colon and rectal cancer. Besides improved cosmesis, other long-term advantages seem to be less adhesion related small bowel obstruction and reduced incisional hernia rate. Adequate patient selection and surgical experience are of crucial importance. Experience can be gradually expanded step by step, by increasing the complexity of the procedure. A decision to convert should be made early in the procedure, because the outcome after a reactive conversion is worse than initial open resection or strategic conversion. The additive value of new techniques such as robotic surgery has to be proven in randomized studies including a cost-effectiveness assessment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-39
Number of pages11
JournalBest Practice and Research: Clinical Gastroenterology
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Laparoscopy for colorectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this