Abstract
As a piece of doctrinal argument the 2009 ruling on Lautsi v. Italy by a Chamber of the Second Section of the ECHR may have been more elegant and convinvcing. Yet, elaborating doctrinal logic does not exhaust the task of the international court. Hence, even though the recent Grand Chamber reversal displays less doctrinal finesse, it is a more prudent decision appropriately sensitive to the social context.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 231-237 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Religion & Human Rights: An International Journal |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Research programs
- SAI 2010-01 RRL
- SAI 2010-01-II RRL sub 2